Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • o7___o7@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Am I the only person not impressed by veo3? Yeah there are more details yada yada, but the details are still wrong.

    The view of the garbage fractal isn’t improved by zooming deeper into the Bullshit-Mandlebrot Set.

  • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    currently reading https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17570

    this is PsiQuantum, who are hot prospects to build an actually-quantum computer

    no, they have not yet factored 35

    but they are seriously planning qubits on a wafer and they think they can make a chip with 1m noisy qubits

    anyone know more about this? does that preprint (from last year) pass sniff tests?

    (my interest is journalistic, and also the first of these companies to factor 35 gets all the VC money ever)

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I unfortunately know jack shit about quantum computing, so I can’t really weigh in, but I am rooting for them to pull it off, because PsiQuantum getting all the VC money ever means AI stops getting all the VC money ever

      • swlabr@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Hey, if we boil the oceans via quantum research, at least we might get some new physics out of it.

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    New artcle from Brian Merchant: An ‘always on’ OpenAI device is a massive backlash waiting to happen

    Giving my personal thoughts on the upcoming OpenAI Devicetm, I think Merchant’s correct to expect mass-scale backlash against the Devicetm and public shaming/ostracisation of anyone who decides to use it - especially considering its an explicit repeat of the widely clowned on Humane AI Pin.

    headlines of Devicetm wearers getting their asses beaten in the street to follow soon afterwards. As Brian’s noted, a lot of people would see wearing an OpenAI Devicetm as an open show of contempt for others, and between AI’s public image becoming utterly fouled by the bubble and Silicon Valley’s reputation going into the toilet, I can see someone seeing a Devicetm wearer as an opportunity to take their well-justified anger at tech corps out on someone who openly and willingly bootlicks for them.

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    New Bluesky post from Baldur Bjarnason:

    What’s missing from the now ubiquitous “LLMs are good for code” is that code is a liability. The purpose of software is to accomplish goals with the minimal amount of code that’s realistically possible

    LLMs may be good for code, but they seem to be a genuine hazard for collaborative software dev

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Veering semi-OT: the guy behind the godawful Windows 11 GUI has revealed himself:

    Looking at his Twitter profile, its clear he’s a general dumpster fire of a human being - most of his feed’s just him retweeting AI garbage or fash garbage.

  • diz@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I was trying out free github copilot to see what the buzz is all about:

    It doesn’t even know its own settings. This one little useful thing that isn’t plagiarism, providing natural language interface to its own bloody settings, it couldn’t do.

    • nightsky@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      In the collection of links of what Ive has done in recent years, there’s one to an article about a turntable redesign he worked on, and from that article:

      The Sondek LP12 has always been entirely retrofittable and Linn has released 50 modular hardware upgrades to the machine, something that Ive said he appreciates. “I love the idea that after years of ownership you can enjoy a product that’s actually better than the one you bought years before,” said Ive.

      I don’t know, should I laugh, or should I scream, that it’s Ive, of all people, saying that.

    • FredFig@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I don’t get it, how is every one of the most touted people in the AI space among the least credible people in the industry.

      Like literally every time its a person whose name I recognize from something else they’ve done, that something else is something I hate.

    • FredFig@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Reminds me something F.D. Signifier said on a music podcast.

      Progressives are losing the cultural war in a lot of ways, but they’ll always need us because we’re the ones pushing the boundaries on art, and it turns out, no matter how ghoulish people want to act, everyone has genuine love of fucking awesome art. The true loss condition is being captured by the tools of the master.

    • zogwarg@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Rekindled a desire to maybe try my own blog ^^.

      I think beyond “Keeping up appearances” it’s also the stereotype of fascists—and by extension LLM lovers—having trouble (or pretending to) distinguishing signifying and signified.

  • blakestacey@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    Curtis Yarvin:

    Girls think the “eu” in “eugenics” means EW. Don’t get the ick, girls! It literally means good.

    So if you’re not into eugenics, that means you must be into dysgenics. Dissing your own genes! OMG girl what

    dr. caitlin m. green:

    … how is this man still able to post from inside the locker he should be stuffed in 24/7

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      Seeing Yarvin mansplain eugenics really does make one wonder how he doesn’t just get suckerpunched whenever he says anything at someone in public.

      • mountainriver@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think he means “mass sterilisation of a population” Vs “mass murder of the same population”, which is genocide either way, and then he would opt for the faster method.

        Or something. Feels extra creepy discussing which genocide is better with the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

        • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I mean I guess you can argue that straight up murder has a certain honesty to it? At the same time that is mainly good because it makes it harder to justify what’s happening compared to anti-miscegenation laws or restricting people to an open-air prison for a few generations. And we can see how that’s working out in the current political climate.

    • istewart@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      sounds like he’s posting from inside a dilapidated white panel van parked strategically just outside a legally-mandated exclusion radius surrounding a middle school

  • scruiser@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    A new LLM plays pokemon has started, with o3 this time. It plays moderately faster, and the twitch display UI is a little bit cleaner, so it is less tedious to watch. But in terms of actual ability, so far o3 has made many of the exact same errors as Claude and Gemini including: completely making things up/seeing things that aren’t on the screen (items in Virdian Forest), confused attempts at navigation (it went back and forth on whether the exit to Virdian Forest was in the NE or NW corner), repeating mistakes to itself (both the items and the navigation issues I mentioned), confusing details from other generations of Pokemon (Nidoran learns double kick at level 12 in Fire Red and Leaf Green, but not the original Blue/Yellow), and it has signs of being prone to going on completely batshit tangents (it briefly started getting derailed about sneaking through the tree in Virdian Forest… i.e. moving through completely impassable tiles).

    I don’t know how anyone can watch any of the attempts at LLMs playing Pokemon and think (viable) LLM agents are just around the corner… well actually I do know: hopium, cope, cognitive bias, and deliberate deception. The whole LLM playing Pokemon thing is turning into less of a test of LLMs and more entertainment and advertising of the models, and the scaffold are extensive enough and different enough from each other that they really aren’t showing the models’ raw capabilities (which are even worse than I complained about) or comparing them meaningfully.

    • aio@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I like how all of the currently running attempts have been equipped with automatic navigation assistance, i.e. a pathfinding algorithm from the 60s. And that’s the only part of the whole thing that actually works.

      • scruiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I wouldn’t say even that part works so well, given how Mt. Moon is such a major challenge even with all the features like that.

        • aio@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          The actual pathfinding algorithm (which is surely just A* search or similar) works just fine; the problem is the LLM which uses it.