hmm I’m not aware of one beyond general “obstructionism” but that probably is a thing that needs a word

shot:

chaser:

(thread)

“chain in the sack” is one of my new favourite semi-nonsense phrases

exactly so

absolutely not the first time I hear something like that, and part of why I don’t really like the guy

At the risk of being critical of Zitron

absolutely not a thing to be “at risk of”, and a little bit worrying to see someone even worrying about

I’m down with reading books it’s just hard to select them without known reference recommendations

Gonna acquire the works of both, ty :D

black mirror enhancement: because the algorithms involved may present multiple likely fits to any given input, each output is also considered a conception and given due protection (even if not used)

this you?

again, I ask you: please make better posts. you could start by not shooting from the hip about things you know little to nothing about. even better would be asking questions to learn.

nice to see the blinders coming off more widely:

For instance, as Electrek reminds us, in 2016, Elon Musk made a promise. He promised that, by the end of 2017, a Tesla would be able to drive itself from coast to coast. We’re talking Los Angeles to New York, with no human intervention.

That was bulls**t. Listen to any tech CEO nowadays and you will hear nothing but an endless stream of wild proclamations about how so-and-so massive shift will occur within the next 10 years! Five years! One year! Next week!

dunno, I seem to recall I’ve seen a couple other stinkers from ronacher lately. dude’s also full on the LLM bandwagon iirc

probably need to keep a notes file

real fucking weird tweet from ronacher there too

nice, good collection of links, will help next time I need to find it. couple weeks ago I mentioned it on masto and I had someone Very Huffily reply to me (a situation I resolved by simply blocking them, gfy with that nonsense)

Xanadu’s micropayment-oriented transclusion-and-royalty system is impossible to correctly implement, due to a mismatch between information theory and copyright; given the ability to copy text, copyright is provably absurd

it kept being funny to me that even while xanadu had already shown the problems with content control the entirety of the NFT craze just went on as if it was full greenfields novel problem

The details lie in the devil, for sure…you’d want the price [of making a change to a document] low enough (zero?) not to incur Trivial Inconvenience penalties for prosocial things like building wikis, yet high enough to make the David Gerards of the world think twice.

some of these people just really don’t know their history very well, do they

on a total tangent:

while xanadu’s commercial-aspiration history is intimately tied up in why it never got much further, I do occasionally daydream about if we had, and if we could’ve combined it with more-modern signing and sourcing: daydream in the respect of “CA and cert chains, but for transcluded content”, esp in the face of all the fucking content mills used to push disinfo etc. not sure this would work ootb either, mind you, it’s got its own set of vulnerabilities and problems that you’d need to work through (and ofc you can’t solve social problems purely in the technical domain)

has there been any meaningful advancement or neat new research in agoric computing? haven’t really looked into it in a while, and the various blockchain nonsense took so much air out of the room for so long I haven’t had to spoons to look

(separately I know there’s also been some developments in remote trusted compute, but afaict that’s also still quite early days)

much of the lore of the early/earlier internet being built is also full of some extremely, extremely unhinged stuff. I’ve had some first-hand in-the-trenches accounts from people I’ve known active from the early-mid 90s to middle 00s and holy shit there are some batshit things happening in places. often think of it when I see the kinds of shit thiel/musk/etc are all up to (a lot of it boils down to “they’re big mad that they have to even consider other people and can’t just do whatever they like”)

I really don’t buy the “billing mistake” line - they’ve been doing the same thing to many other community-org slacks. I’ve seen with my own eyes the mail that was sent to the ZA tech slack

will keep the offer in mind when I have the spoons and round tuits for it :)

I’m a bit split on this one

on the one hand, the post as first posted had a lot of “victimised” language (“omg slack is extorting us”) and frankly that felt like bait - esp as many, many volunteer-type orgs that have had similar slack setups have been taking a hammer for months now (as I posted before, a local ZA tech setup was one, and more recently that big k8s one too). there’s enough precedent here that expecting slack to have behaved otherwise (even “honourably”) seems to me to have been almost foolish

on the other, slack 100% only took action once this did hit hype and enough eyeballs, and only reacted since it was an embarrassment

but…yeah. slack hasn’t been a good option for public use for literally years now :|

it would be incredible if yud’s one of the types to lose his focus around sauce 3, would do a real kicker to the shine of his grift

someday™ I’ll get around to looking into getting a season pack from the states to here (which possibly might be distinctly non-trivial, and if it is I’ll have bother trying to figure out the logistics of it, which ugh)