

“Let’s also advance someone who is less popular than our previous candidate for president.”
Somehow Newsome beat AI by 1 point in terms of positive impact.


“Let’s also advance someone who is less popular than our previous candidate for president.”
Somehow Newsome beat AI by 1 point in terms of positive impact.


Actually had a therapist introduce me to it. It can be a useful model, and if I were to boil it down to a single adage it would be: pay attention to how you talk to yourself. But I don’t think it is as simple as saying you contain a multitude, each part was developed to help the person survive and as you get older you might collect more parts and suppress others. It actually reminded me a bit of Lacan and the developmental stages.


You didn’t define authoritarianism or specifically say how it is so in this case, leaving us to guess and you to say we guessed wrong.


Someone is probably hawking AI driven backups as we type


The part about robots doing backflips causes the robot to wear down faster has me thinking the whole “replace humans with humanoids” should be framed as comparative advantage rather than how many robots would be required to build itself. Given the number of humanoids required to replicate itself, you could take those same complex parts, rearrange them into non-humanoid configurations and have more output both in an interval of time and over the life time of those parts.


I wonder what they’ll name that nuclear disaster after…


Ehh, China is increasingly caring about it’s international image, and there’s always backroom deals.


Let me see if I got this right: Because use cases for LLMs have to be resilient to hallucinations, large data centers will fall out of favor for smaller, cheaper deployments at the cost of accuracy. And once you have a business that is categorizing relevant data, you will gradually move away from black box LLMs and towards ML on the edge to cut costs and also at the cost of accuracy.


It’s still telling you what you want to hear but with a different aesthetic. This will always be the case for systems that can’t even perceive it’s own lies.
“So anyways I built a new language luan and you are a bad person if you don’t appreciate it”


Did they train this off Epstein’s own statements? Cuz this looks a lot like grooming


Looks a lot like the computer from the recent movie Elio



Okay but that is different from the argument that entry developers only need to be half as good to deliver a working product


You’re the one bringing up popularity in response to a substantial argument. I hope you’re okay…


Thank you for doubling down on irony at the end, you had me going!


3% of the population being scammers sounds about right.


I struggled with passive wording until I learned certain tells like my use of the word “would”. Once you learn what words to look out for you start to actively reword things as you write them. Asking AI to rework your passive tone isn’t going to rewire your brain to write better.


That’s just it though, it’s not going to replace you at doing your job. It is going to replace you by doing a worse job.


Not sure how I would trigger a follow-up question like that. I think most of the questions seemed pre-programmed but the transcription and AI response to the answer would “hallucinate”. They really just wanted to make sure they were talking to someone real and not an AI candidate because I talked to a real person next who asked much of the same.
Which ones ship to the states? I bought shoes little over a month ago and it is already developing holes. Normally I buy xero shoes but the tarrifs on China has made it less affordable