Good point. Now I imagine someone trying to pass the turing test by having their bot pretend to be a sales person.

I guess a certain country is using LLMs to try to engage people 1:1 to change their opinions of said country.

Came across this today: the purpose of a system is what it does. Based on that I would say the purpose of Claude was to make mistakes and get my coworker fired.

Coworker got fired because he used AI to plan for a site installment of our product. The AI made a very nice looking plan but it failed to include enough packing material so nearly half of the units arrived broken. Boss still thinks AI is going to revolutionize work for the better though.

Which ones ship to the states? I bought shoes little over a month ago and it is already developing holes. Normally I buy xero shoes but the tarrifs on China has made it less affordable

“Let’s also advance someone who is less popular than our previous candidate for president.”

Somehow Newsome beat AI by 1 point in terms of positive impact.

Actually had a therapist introduce me to it. It can be a useful model, and if I were to boil it down to a single adage it would be: pay attention to how you talk to yourself. But I don’t think it is as simple as saying you contain a multitude, each part was developed to help the person survive and as you get older you might collect more parts and suppress others. It actually reminded me a bit of Lacan and the developmental stages.

You didn’t define authoritarianism or specifically say how it is so in this case, leaving us to guess and you to say we guessed wrong.

Someone is probably hawking AI driven backups as we type

The part about robots doing backflips causes the robot to wear down faster has me thinking the whole “replace humans with humanoids” should be framed as comparative advantage rather than how many robots would be required to build itself. Given the number of humanoids required to replicate itself, you could take those same complex parts, rearrange them into non-humanoid configurations and have more output both in an interval of time and over the life time of those parts.

I wonder what they’ll name that nuclear disaster after…

Ehh, China is increasingly caring about it’s international image, and there’s always backroom deals.

Let me see if I got this right: Because use cases for LLMs have to be resilient to hallucinations, large data centers will fall out of favor for smaller, cheaper deployments at the cost of accuracy. And once you have a business that is categorizing relevant data, you will gradually move away from black box LLMs and towards ML on the edge to cut costs and also at the cost of accuracy.

It’s still telling you what you want to hear but with a different aesthetic. This will always be the case for systems that can’t even perceive it’s own lies.

“So anyways I built a new language luan and you are a bad person if you don’t appreciate it”

Did they train this off Epstein’s own statements? Cuz this looks a lot like grooming

Looks a lot like the computer from the recent movie Elio

Okay but that is different from the argument that entry developers only need to be half as good to deliver a working product

You’re the one bringing up popularity in response to a substantial argument. I hope you’re okay…

Thank you for doubling down on irony at the end, you had me going!