

I’m hearing that the “messages” are mundane manufacturer markings misinterpreted
Only Bayes Can Judge Me
I’m hearing that the “messages” are mundane manufacturer markings misinterpreted
Epstein was a sophon controlled trisolaran asset working to prevent crucial development of physics!!! j/k
“One of our guys was murdered; it could have only been an elite Navy SEAL with over 300 confirmed kills!!!” them, probably
The covens appreciate the overture.
This fucking bubble cannot pop fast enough.
Thoughts and prayers, definitely no curses.
pentafecta(?)
it should be quinella but it isn’t, and there isn’t a nice name for it, unless you count something like “Super 5”
I started reading his post with that title to refresh myself. Just to get your feet wet:
DEC 01, 2010
Added Oct ’13: <insert content warning here>
Man, what happened in the three years it took for a content warning?
Anyway I skimmed it, the rest of the post is a huge pile of shit that I don’t want to read any more of, I’m sure it’s been picked apart already. But JFC.
Most famously, Robin is […] also the inventor of futarchy
A futarchy, you say? Tell me more, Robin Hanson
Yeah, that headline and its writer can kick rocks.
is this where Yud gets his style from? jesus fuck.
that’s a big oof from me dawg.
RE: “liberal” as a label: the way that I define “liberal” is pretty much purely in the classical sense, and it still covers the “modern” “left-of-center” sense, because someone who claims to be a left-liberal that still supports the underlying liberal politics is actually disconnected from any actual leftist ideology. Most left-liberals are willing to throw actual leftists and leftist causes under the bus so that their sports team party can get into power.
First thought: “Who?”
Second thought: “No, Hugo”
Anyway, I know nothing about this guy. His wiki page listed an imdb page, and know you get to know that he has a Bacon number of 3.
I looked into this because I was curious. There’s a wikipedia article that discusses abundance, titled “supply-side progressivism”)
So it appears the earliest mention of liberal tinted Reaganomics is Miles Kimball’s opening blog post “What is a Supply-Side Liberal” on his blog “Confessions of a Supply-Side Liberal.” I am not going to investigate his politics at any real depth, so I’d say he’s mostly a liberal/centrist.
I think my understanding of “abundance” before reading that wiki page was that known liberal quantities Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson wrote a book on it, and therefore must have invented it.
Oh Abundance, the repackaging of Reaganomics by liberals to court conservatives, is having a conference and has booked right wing speakers? Nobody could have predicted this
This is truly nothing: Aella (credited as Aella Martin) has a Bacon number of 3
the answer to all those is yes. To synthesise the bigger idea, as the saying goes: scratch a liberal, a fascist bleeds. Gladwell caters to a huge audience that is centrist, leaning somewhat liberal (though he flirts constantly with race science and straight up racism, see his writings on Korean Air). As liberals move towards fascism, so must he. Of course, it’s the most marginalised that are going to be targeted first.
Enemy of awful systems Malcolm Gladwell is a full throated transphobe
Y’all are having fun without me? Wow, rude
I’m seeing this as the source