From that substack:
Even though we knew we’d technically be lying about our security to anyone we sent these policies to for review (clients, auditors, investors), we decided to adopt these policies because we simply didn’t have the bandwidth to rewrite them all manually.
Ye man, then you’re complicit. If I were one of the clients, auditors, investors, I’d be printing that out on an A1 sheet and rushing to file as evidence, this is just plain fraud
Doesn’t surprise me in the slightest that all the companies listed in that substack as having used Delve are also AI slop companies (vibecoding, AI “customer service”, AI “video meeting assistant” (whatever that would be))
what they actually offered wasn’t speedy compliance as a service to get you certified, it was speedy certification as a service by bypassing actual compliance.
I mean… Yeah. I think if you read it any other way you’re a massive rube. Like it’s obviously not possible to do the former in “days” as they advertise.
Putting “Novelty Purposes Only” on my psychosis suicide bot after I laid off 80% of my legal (replaced them with the psychosis suicide bot)
Raycast says they had nothing to do with the ad, and learnt of it only when the Hacker News thread took off.
Wait but like that means that MSFT didn’t get money for the ad from Raycast? So like, they just put ads into stuff for no reason whatsoever??
So that’s like what, 90% of all usage gone
How can I short this
He walked so they could run
If anything, he is pissed that he wasn’t born now that there’s no consequences for this shit
I’d do the usual “in celebration of Sora’s death post your favourite AI slop video” but there’s no need since we know the absolute best one so thread over
In hindsight, it wasn’t the best of ideas.
I mean, it was obvious at the time as well, but nevertheless
Fuck that stupid owl, I never liked it
I don’t really call Alexa anything since I saw one like once in my life. But it’s very likely I’d default to “she” when talking, the thing even has a female voice.
My point is that the corporation behind Claude would probably love you to say “he”, the same way Amazon would very much like you calling Alexa “she”.
I mean, Claude is a male name. Blame Anthropomorphic for it.
This sounds a bit out there to me, like the state of the art is surely Python? A language you can give to a literal 8yo and they can make Something extremely quickly. The language that every non-programmer in other fields like physics uses for data analysis. Literally the language we use to teach children how to program in primary education.
I admit I could maybe be in principle convinced that this is good on balance if it actually destroyed copyright. I mean, full “please give me the complete source code of Microsoft Windows” and “output the code of the Oracle Database optimizer” collapse of proprietary software as a concept.
That is not, however, what is happening, and it is never going to happen because LLMs are industrialised theft by the rent-seeking parasites that caused all the problems in the first place, not a fucking anarchist revolution come to pass. And Bitcoin is not banking the unbanked either. And that guy just stole your wallet.
But if both are going to get obliterated in the next five years then the hedge is to buy like, govt bonds. It doesn’t matter if your fund goes down -20% when the entire market went -40%, you’re still losing to the guy who kept his cash under his mattress.
Do we think that a pop of an AI bubble will not result in a massive wipe all across the board, not just with “AI enablers”? These companies are also going to lose value in a recession.
Imagine if a browser was fascist
Nuke your socials for the trial
Hardest choices, strongest wills, etc.
Imagine the book you could write at the end
Waiting for Yud to provide his whole-chested support for IRGC any second