• self@awful.systems
    shield
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    if you’re here to recommend ladybird, tell us why you’re doing advocacy for that trash fire in spite of the well-sourced, ah, downsides pointed out in article and video linked from the OP.

    same for brave. I don’t give a fuck if privacyguides told you it was the goodest browser.

    if you’re here to advocate for ladybird or brave and haven’t read the article in the OP, fuck off. don’t come here pretending to discuss something you haven’t read.

    • self@awful.systems
      shield
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      important addendum: your reason for advocating for shit browsers owned by terrible people will be read out loud in the clown voice it deserves

      • blakestacey@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Lemmy needs a feature where we can click a button on a comment and make everyone see that comment in Comic Sans.

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          so I’m not saying I’m writing this down for the Lemmy clone’s features list, but

          • nfultz@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago
            .comment-node :has(.text-danger) {
                font-family: "Comic Sans MS", "Comic Sans" ;
            }
            

            Sorry (not sorry).

        • Soyweiser@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          Careful, don’t slander Comic Sans. It is an asshole, and has the party people on its side.

          (I also think the font gets too much flak, perhaps to really show our distaste of the comment make it the fraktur font, and flip it around (I did recently learn that flipping a front upside down/around makes it very hard to read for people who have trouble visualizing things in their head, which I had not thought about as being an issue)

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Sorry but it’s not like there are many options here…

      Ladybird is not even alpha yet so of course it does not work… and if a 5 second clip of someone using Copilot is enough to rule out a browser, well there will no options left

      I too want a world where a decent programmer I would like to buy a beer for is coding a lovely browser with no AI and that respects my privacy, but alas, we live in this horrible world where asking for that seems to be too much.

      At the end of the day, if ladybird happens to work well (when finished), I will use that instead of Edge or Chrome… you need to grow up people or we will all get run over by the very people we are trying to oppose

  • TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    This feels a little sensational. While I’m disappointed the new CEO wants to waste time on it, as long as we can turn it odd its not terrible. And its still the only real competition to Chrome. All the forks still rely on Mozilla’s work, though I would love to see that situation improve.

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      after a decade+ of Mozilla dropping the ball on purpose and violating user consent, thank fuck we’ve got you! somebody needed to pointlessly restate the latter half of the video while carrying water for the millionaire CEO of a nonprofit grift and I certainly as fuck would rather fucking die

  • solomonschuler@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Never got a chance to try it on arch, but I’ve heard ladybird browser is good. Ladybird is a new web browser completely made from scratch, I tried installing it today but for some reason the app refused to open.

    • Statick@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’m doing the same, and I gotta say, I’m really liking the small differences in the UI on both android and desktop.

      The popup menu on Android is way better.

      The customization for the tabs/highlights on desktop are great.

      Subtle differences, but I appreciate the options nonetheless.

    • Mii@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      As for Orion: while I like the idea of having a browser that’s neither Chromium nor Gecko in the mix, Orion is made by Kagi which, at least in the past, self-described as an AI company, so I’m not sure how much I trust their stance to keep slop machines out of it (spoiler: I don’t). Also their CEO seems like a bit of a twat.

      And it’s not really open source either apart from the WebKit parts as far as I know.

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        their absolute twat of a CEO is still running kagi as an AI company, and kagi fans get really weird when you bring it up

    • Seminar2250@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      The least-worst of the Chrome reskins is Vivaldi, which has no AI. It has its own adblocker, but it’s not as good a blocker as FIrefox with uBlock Origin. And Vivaldi’s not open source. But they’re relatively non-evil.

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    you_were_the_chosen_one.gif

    I jumped ship to Librewolf a year and a half ago (after seeing Mozilla steal people’s data and sell it to advertisers), and I’m pretty fucking thankful for that. For anyone looking to leave Mozilla to rot, I highly recommend it.

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      how are the defaults for librewolf? I’m considering switching but I’m hearing mixed things about the defaults occasionally breaking sites. waterfox seems pretty good too, but I don’t see it packaged as frequently as librewolf.

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        The defaults are significantly better than Brave. Hands down Brave has turned to garbage.

      • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        The defaults are pretty strict, but most of the page-breaking stuff can be changed in the LibreWolf settings and each one has a description which usually contains a link to a wiki article detailing why you’d want to change it or think twice before changing it.

      • blakestacey@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        My only difficulty with LibreWolf on Ubuntu was getting it to be the default browser (it didn’t show up in the list of options). Turns out xdg-settings set default-web-browser librewolf.desktop on the command line did the trick.

      • Artaca@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        started switching and testing options last week. Librewolf’s default are awful, but undoing that has been better than having to look at the ugly Waterfox logo, in my opinion. If the logo is a non issue for you, WF had better default settings. I’m overly particular

      • ebu@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        i’ll go against the grain here: Librewolfs’s defaults are firmly “meh” for me. still an improvement over the “what the fuck” that’s happening in Firefox.

        pros: nixs the annoying Pocket / AI / “suggested” nonsense by default. no annoying extras.

        neutrals: Firefox Sync is off, but one click and a restart to turn back on. reasonable for a non-Mozilla project. no cookies saved by default might be annoying for some, but you can add exceptions right from the URL bar and i only have a dozen or so of those set for various sites. gods, cohost is still in that list…

        cons: ResistFingerprinting is IMHO way overkill and breaks nice things like automatic dark modes just for preserving privacy in the 0.001% of cases where browser fingerprinting matters. same as WebGL being off by default – i just don’t need that kind of protection

        i still recommend it. Disable ResistFingerprinting, enable WebGL, enable Firefox Sync, and decide for yourself if you want auto-clearing cookies or not. i also always enable vertical tabs because my horizontal space is a lot less constricted than my vertical. (it’s a FF feature!)

  • fnix@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Used FF for over a decade, switched to Vivaldi about a month ago. It’s pretty much as the article says, adblocking not as good as FF+uBlock, but it mostly does the job, including YouTube videos. Note the inbuilt adblocker also works on mobile, tho there’s no extension support there. One upside I discovered is that the performance is slightly better at least on my mid-range devices, the web is just built around Chrome-related browsers nowadays unfortunately. It’s a bit feature-bloated for my taste with even an inbuilt browser-game (you can hide it from the menus), but honestly that’s at least cute and more sincere than AI crap.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Presumably, if Firefox version N breaks ad-blocking, someone can make a hard fork of version N-1. Security patches, upgrades to OS support and things like new CSS/HTML features can be cherry-picked or reimplemented to it, though Firefox updates in general will not be admitted, as it’s a hard fork (in the way that LibreOffice or MariaDB is). At worst, Firefox will actively make it hard to do this, closing their source or changing their licence to one which prohibits it, requiring any updates to be reimplemented clean-room style, which will slow things down, though if the alternative is actively enshittified, it’s the least-bad option.

    • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      The good news is it generally isn’t necessary to reverse engineer browser behavior when writing a browser. Since it’s mostly fairly standardized, there’s a decent test suite, and the major browsers are all open source.

      Though this comes with some caveats:

      • There are exceptions like the CSS viewport spec which was reverse engineered from an iphone.
      • There are a lot of specifications because browsers have been around for decades and Chromium keeps implementing stuff, and it can be hard to find enough programmers to write all of them / catch up from a fresh start
      • This is a somewhat unstable situation; if we lose even a single major browser engine it’s easy to imagine Chrome maybe not bothering with standardization and just telling people to read the blog posts and code.
      • Web pages will do nonsense like break themselves if you provide a User-Agent string they don’t like. Mozilla has an ongoing compatibility effort where they sometimes have to override the UA string for specific pages. So less popular browsers are already playing from a disadvantageous position.
    • sc_griffith@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      small typo.

      So guess what Mozilla did? When you update Firefox, tt re-enables the AI! And if you disable the AI again, it re-enables it again next update! Choose correctly, user!

      “tt” should “it”

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      tell us more about how you didn’t read the article or watch the video

      specifically tell us how you missed ladybird’s developer being a fascist who’s already vibe coding the worthless fucking thing

      actually no, maybe just don’t fucking post here

            • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              uh have you tried xydfgq-blurble browser it’s my home brew fork of chromium and firefox i call it “chromefox” which is also my fursona

              thinking of changing the name to something lighthearted, marketable and non-objectionable like “GNU-Scrotum”

              i am the only maintainer and i keep up with 110% of security issues

              we are not in the android store as the oppressive statists at google said that if i ever switched on this uh “piece of shit” in a built up area theyd cut my nuts off, but

              ignore the FUD about chromefox spilling your bank account and leaking your tastes in hentai and fucking your cat it’s all LIES FILTHY LIES by THAT BITCH ANDREW he is SUCH an asshole

              anyway free software stallman was right peace out

              • swlabr@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                23 days ago

                It would be even better if it were <classical element> <animal>. Unless we were to retcon throat as a classical element. I would not say no to that

  • Soyweiser@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Unrelated to the article/vid itself, thanks for making both a video, podcast, and an article. I know it is a lot of work, but I really appreciate being able to read it than having to watch a video.

  • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    from the youtube browser comments, “Ladybird is our last hope” seems to be the new standard promotional cut’n’paste phrase

    last hope for what, you might ask? well the true anti-woke browser, which is much more important than actually, say, working.

    presumably brave is too SJW for these guys, as well as basically working insofar as it’s just a chrome reskin

    they want the TRUE GLORIOVS FVTVRE that only a nonexistent thing that doesn’t fucking work, and won’t cos the lead bozo is vibe coding it, can offer.

    in fashtech, promises of future glory always beat present day actually fucking working