

people who think ‘it kinda works’ is the standard to aim for
I swear that this is a form of AI psychosis or something because the attitude is suddenly ubiquitous among the AI obsessed.


people who think ‘it kinda works’ is the standard to aim for
I swear that this is a form of AI psychosis or something because the attitude is suddenly ubiquitous among the AI obsessed.


Wasn’t he on YouTube trying to convince people that Nuclear Energy is Fine Actually? Figures.


Looks like cypherpunk slop


but with Haskell replaced with a much worse ML with a much less coherent type system
Urbit moment


You can’t take TSMC by force. Any fighting there would trash the fabs, and anyway you need imported equipment to keep it running. So if China did invade Taiwan and wreck it, there’d be little point in trying to take it back.


I genuinely wonder how I’m gonna be a programmer long term because the industry has been so thoroughly infested with this nonsense.


“They might as well be Latvians” is a straight out of Arrested Development.


Eliezer is a major contributor to the rationalist attitude of venerating super-forecasters and super-predictors and promoting the idea that rational smart well informed people should be able to put together super accurate predictions!
This is a necessary component of his imagined AGI monster. Good thing it’s bullshit.


Why would anyone name a browser after Ronald Reagan’s wife anyway


Since this is the solo version, strawmasturbating


Re fame, he ends up on the orange site often enough: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=scottaaronson.com
Wonder if people karma farm there…


Only things that a hidden camera can do.


This is a massive loss. At this point we need specific legislation. Insane to grant fair use to a for-profit copier that provides no benefit to the owner of the copied item and competes with it in the market. I cannot overstate how shitty this is.
Imagine if it was trying to build a feature for a client who needs to look at a demo every time.
You can definitely learn how to code, I believe in you.


What’s the Rationalist reaction to these developments? Are there any vestigial AI-fearers that haven’t switched over to straight up Phrenology like Slatescott and are currently genuinely still worried about the apocalypse because of this?


OSI is gonna mandate that we call it open source now, didn’t ya hear?


Can’t people run it locally supposedly?


I didn’t think today was gonna be a day where I’d read about sounding then breaking glass rods but here we are.
I was trying to see if Paul Graham was in the Epstein files (seems to mostly be due to Twitter spam) but then I found this email from 2016 with Scooter’s powerword:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00824072.pdf
The context is that AI guy Joscha Bach wants to “have a brainstorm” on “forbidden research” (you best believe IQ is in there, but also climate change prepping which in phrased in a particularly omenous fashion) and there’s a long list of people at the end. Besides slatescott it includes
Epstein Himself Paul Graham Max Teigmark Stephen Wolfram Stephen Pinker (ofc) Reid Hoffman
It’s unclear if this brainstorm ever happened or if Astral Scottdex was even contacted. The next email features Epstein chastising Joscha Bach for not shutting up in a discussion with Noam Chomsky and Bach’s last email is just groveling and trying to smooth over the relationship with his benefactor.
I think this is (at least a little bit) interesting because it’s back in 2016, a year before ‘intellectual dark web’ was coined and that whole ball got rolling.
Has Scooter addressed his presence in the files the way other-scott did?