фeddit.bg
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 1 year ago

Lol. Lmao even. "DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy"

techstartups.com

external-link
message-square
77
link
fedilink
200
external-link

Lol. Lmao even. "DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy"

techstartups.com

Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
77
link
fedilink
DeepSeek R1 reproduced for $30: Berkeley researchers replicate DeepSeek R1 for $30—casting doubt on H100 claims and controversy
techstartups.com
external-link

Sam “wrong side of FOSS history” Altman must be pissing himself.

Direct Nitter Link:

https://nitter.lucabased.xyz/jiayi_pirate/status/1882839370505621655

  • SGforce@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    They finetuned 1.5-3b models. This is a non-story

    • Yozul@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      The headline is dumb, but the research isn’t. According to the actual contents of the article, that $30 is still 27 times cheaper than what it costs OpenAI to make a similar sized model which also performs worse. That’s still a big deal even if the people reporting on it made a stupid title for their article about it.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like the author here doesnt know what the definition of “breakthrough” is.

    • MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup and it’s not even testing general reasoning. They didn’t have money for that.

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        fuck almighty have these DeepSeek threads been attracting a lot of LLM “experts”

        • swlabr@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          LLM experts aka poop sommeliers

          • flavia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            MrPoopyButthole

            Fucking hell what the hell is with the usernames do they want to be made fun of?

            • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s a Rick and Morty 🤮 character

              • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                lol that’s worse! 👍

      • swlabr@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is General reasoning in the room with us now?

        • V0ldek@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s actually “Reasonings General”, common misconception

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          I heard someone say Private Reasoning was around the corner. Think they’re related?

          • bitofhope@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I hear Private Reasoning of the first through nth LLM Understander Corps is highly motivated

        • bitofhope@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s no way to know since they didn’t have the money to test.

        • o7___o7@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is that the guy who sells insurance with Shaq?

TechTakes@awful.systems

techtakes@awful.systems

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !techtakes@awful.systems

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 13 users / day
  • 72 users / week
  • 144 users / month
  • 3.14K users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 2.36K subscribers
  • 808 Posts
  • 19.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • David Gerard@awful.systems
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org