idk it’s my first time (kind of) trying to do dataviz, I thought the original post was super interesting but like other comments said, it was hard to read.

I think in a way it’s mostly because defederation is complex to show as links, since it is the break of said link, but hopefully this type of graph is better ?

you do lose the “group” of instances view, though (and also I did not bother with per instance MAU as raw number + percentage, or sofware used)

let me know what you think!

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It doesn’t even Include https://lemmy.today/ that has no defederation or blocking at all, and has never had, since the admin feels it’s up to the user and not the admin to decide these things. You know, free and open internet, remember?

    Also one of the best themes of all Lemmy instances if you ask me.

    • Pika@hikki.team
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Came here to say that!

      I can’t comprehend why people would join instances in the list. If you don’t like a particular instance, just hop into the user settings and block it! Why let others set your blocklist?

    • inlandempire@jlai.luOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      You gotta ask the OOP about that, but my guess is, in a graph that shows instances that defederate, why include an instance that doesn’t?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        why include an instance that doesn’t?

        Because it lets you see how common or uncommon defederations are relative to the total set of all instances (or at least, all minus the long tail of very-low-user-count ones). And although it would make the graph larger, it would also make it sparse and IMO that would also be easier to read.

        It could also give a misleading impression that all instances defederate or are defederated by somebody, making people think it’s more common than it actually is. (Or maybe not doing that, if you include allish instances and it still ends up being not very sparse.)

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I see your point I guess. Perhaps defederation is something that users want, and then they are happy to see who does it the most?

        Im not like that myself, but I can see the point.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I notice that it presents sites with the same editorial body as separate cases, such as piefed.ca and lemmy.ca. Perhaps it would make sense and potentially improve readability to collapse any cases that have the same in and out arcs as each other. (So, all the cases that have no blocks and only block lemmygrad as one collapsed entry, for example.)

  • Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    A bit scarier than the previous one at first glance, but the single line explanation including everything needed to understand makes it easier to read.

    • Auster@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Something though, I think it’d be better to have a cut-off of MAU or some other relevance metric, as otherwise smaller instances defederating from major ones may sneakily make the major one seem more isolated than it really is.

  • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ah, thankyou! As a lazy person not sure who my instance was blocking, I now know. Excellent. Better find an instance who doesn’t block any instances.

  • ozoned@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I know lots of folks look at this and see a shattering of the what they expect. The Fediverse is NOT a platform. Lemmy.world is NOT the Threadiverse. Let’s break these bonds. I left a server because I was suspected of being a CIA plant. I went to one that was more welcoming. I found they were too strict for me on their rules. I left that. I’m not on piefed.social. I’m planning on running my own piefed for ME and MY family/friends hopefully SOON^TM. If someone defederates from me, that’s ok, they didn’t want me to be a part of their community. MY community still exists.

    These aren’t platforms that are out there trying to save the entire world. They’re building a community that interconnects to other communities. Don’t like how they’re doing it, you can literally spin up your own for dollars per month.

    Yes, if you want your stuff to be found you have to advocate for it.

    I think the Trek communities are stand outs of how this works and how it should be done. Think of like old Forum days. Normally folks would create a forum for a specific topic and other thigns would go other places. But now those forums connect and you can run your own and connect to everyone.

    Break this idea that this major pillars disconnecting are fracturing the fediverse. IMO the more small instances we have the stronger the network.

    So build a Piefed/Lemmy/Mastodon/GoToSocial/Bonfire whatever for your community and then allow those to connect out to others.

    The idea of this change is scary though. And maybe I’m wrong. Maybe we can’t exist the way I hope we do. But I think humans strive for community and communication and we have a new way to provide it to them.

    • Auster@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Besides, and related to “not being a platform”, it helps break the idea of everyone having to share the same space with everyone. If two groups can’t have a healthy relationship, it is healthier for them to cut ties with each other. Meanwhile, the oligarchic platforms being as big and with barely any internal borders makes for the toxic environment of places like Reddit and Twitter that predates recent polemics.

    • Don’t like how they’re doing it, you can literally spin up your own for dollars per month.

      Not so easy.
      Mostly a liability issue.
      First there’s security - make sure the server doesn’t get compromised.
      Then you need to figure out how to deal with illegal content like CSAM (was already a widespread issue on Lemmy at least once, causing multiple instances to shutdown) - even on private instance due to content caching.
      And legal issues such as minimum age and privacy regulations that you’d have to comply with.

      3rd one is not an issue if you only use it yourself, and perhaps with a couple of friends that won’t try to sue you when they get mad.

    • Rimu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are 500 Lemmy instances and 80 PieFed instances which are too small to show on the graph :)

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Agreed. Its federated. Let instances do thier thing. It gives us more options not less.

      • northertech@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I always thought that people are drawn into the default instances because they have less friction to sign up and login in third-party apps. Along with new people not quite grasping how the fediverse works when they start using it.

        • ozoned@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes. This. Big Tech has taught folks that there’s only ONE place to sign up. We have to help folks realize, and undo the damage, of centralization. And that’s going to be a very personal and community minded idea. We shouldn’t be going up to everyone and yelling “SIGN UP TO MASTODON!” Because we’ll get “how?” And the answer will be mastodon.social. Instead we need to find groups, let’s say your local gaming group and say “hey I set up this thing that allows us to talk about our local gaming group and OH YEAH it connects to all this other cool shit btw.”

  • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s very pretty and a worthwhile attempt, but personally I think it’s rather unreadable lol. All you need is four circles for the four major groups that defederate.

  • Snoopy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    The similar color makes it slightly difficult to read but the graph is better, and easier to understand. Anyways, you are skilled, good job :3

  • ghen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m on sh.ijust.works because it has a bad word in it. I don’t know what you’re all complaining about