db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 1 year agoThe Prophetlemmy.dbzer0.comexternal-linkmessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up1251arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1251arrow-down1external-linkThe Prophetlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square58linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareblaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 year agoThey are neat tools, if looked at realistically. They certainly don’t deserve to be called AI. I like to call them High Coherence Media Transformers.
minus-squareTh4tGuyII@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 year agoConsidering the “hallucinations” I’ve seen, they’re definitely high something haha
minus-squareo7___o7@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year ago“Decepticons” is right there!
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agowe call them autoplag(iarism) machines, much more honest
minus-squareblaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·1 year agoYes, that certainly applies to the most popular ones, but not necessarily true for all instances of these technologies.
They are neat tools, if looked at realistically. They certainly don’t deserve to be called AI. I like to call them High Coherence Media Transformers.
Considering the “hallucinations” I’ve seen, they’re definitely high something haha
“Decepticons” is right there!
we call them autoplag(iarism) machines, much more honest
Yes, that certainly applies to the most popular ones, but not necessarily true for all instances of these technologies.