db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 years agoThe Prophetlemmy.dbzer0.comexternal-linkmessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up1251arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1251arrow-down1external-linkThe Prophetlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square58linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareblaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 years agoThey are neat tools, if looked at realistically. They certainly don’t deserve to be called AI. I like to call them High Coherence Media Transformers.
minus-squareTh4tGuyII@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up19·2 years agoConsidering the “hallucinations” I’ve seen, they’re definitely high something haha
minus-squareo7___o7@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 years ago“Decepticons” is right there!
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 years agowe call them autoplag(iarism) machines, much more honest
minus-squareblaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·2 years agoYes, that certainly applies to the most popular ones, but not necessarily true for all instances of these technologies.
They are neat tools, if looked at realistically. They certainly don’t deserve to be called AI. I like to call them High Coherence Media Transformers.
Considering the “hallucinations” I’ve seen, they’re definitely high something haha
“Decepticons” is right there!
we call them autoplag(iarism) machines, much more honest
Yes, that certainly applies to the most popular ones, but not necessarily true for all instances of these technologies.