Ghost in the Machine, directed by Valerie VeatchArtificial intelligence is now part of everyday life. But what forces created it? "Ghost in the Machine" trac...
So everything that exists must have different names? It’s very common for things of all kinds to have the same name, no matter if they’re at all related or not. And it’s obviously much less of a “problem” when they’re not related and in completely different categories.
I’m just trying to be helpful, I’m like 9000% sure you meant Ghost In The Shell (2017) starring beat takeshi. You can just admit your wrong and move on
you mean Ghost in the Shell, the anime that was named after the 1949 philosophical concept of a ghost in the machine, which the documentary is named after? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_machine
I mean Ghost in the Machine, a movie from 1993 about a serial killer who gets struck by lightening and somehow ends up digitized and uses a digital scan of a woman’s planner to stalk her and her son and attempt to kill them.
your excuse for not engaging with an important anti-AI documentary is that it reminds you of an obscure 90s B-movie that was named after the same extremely well-known philosophical concept from 1949?
What I said was I found the fact that the documentary (the first I am hearing about, by the way) has the same name as a movie that already exists and that’s confusing.
I don’t know why this is hard to understand. If the documentary was named “The Art of the Deal” would that not be a little confusing? Maybe even a little off putting?
I was so curious to see if they’d fucking get it but no
their history of posting on Fuck AI and having one mid post here really made them think they could come in here, refuse to engage with the topic of the thread, and quadruple down on uhh the anti-AI documentary being unwatchable because it reminds them of a movie only they watched
The 1993 movie was kinda popular back in the day. I think y’all need to stop overthinking what they said and just take their actual words for face value because it is confusing if you actually knew about the 1993 film and saw this post’s title thinking that’s what they were showing.
Yeah, I don’t like that. Naming your documentary the same name as a movie from the early 90’s is a choice. A confusing choice.
So everything that exists must have different names? It’s very common for things of all kinds to have the same name, no matter if they’re at all related or not. And it’s obviously much less of a “problem” when they’re not related and in completely different categories.
You’re being mad over absolutely nothing.
i find this comment fascinating because i don’t see what’s particularly confusing about the 90’s. why not the 70’s?
i think you mean 2017
No, actually. I don’t.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Machine_(1993_film)
pretty sure you mean Ghost in the Shell (2017)
Pretty sure I do not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Machine_(1993_film)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Shell_(2017_film) I think you meant this link, that other link links to a different, unrelated movie
No. I meant exactly the link I picked. It’s not about the contents of the movie or the documentary. It is about the title.
I’m just trying to be helpful, I’m like 9000% sure you meant Ghost In The Shell (2017) starring beat takeshi. You can just admit your wrong and move on
Hey now, it’s possible that they meant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ghost_in_the_Shell_(2026_TV_series)
You’re being a dick. And a troll so far as I can tell.
you mean Ghost in the Shell, the anime that was named after the 1949 philosophical concept of a ghost in the machine, which the documentary is named after? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_machine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_Machine_(1993_film)
I mean Ghost in the Machine, a movie from 1993 about a serial killer who gets struck by lightening and somehow ends up digitized and uses a digital scan of a woman’s planner to stalk her and her son and attempt to kill them.
your excuse for not engaging with an important anti-AI documentary is that it reminds you of an obscure 90s B-movie that was named after the same extremely well-known philosophical concept from 1949?
That’s not what I said.
What I said was I found the fact that the documentary (the first I am hearing about, by the way) has the same name as a movie that already exists and that’s confusing.
I don’t know why this is hard to understand. If the documentary was named “The Art of the Deal” would that not be a little confusing? Maybe even a little off putting?
anything to not have to turn on your brain and watch the fucking documentary this thread is about, I guess!
I just don‘t understand how this fucking guy kept doubling down on fucking nothing. Thanks for letting this continue for as long as it did
maybe it’s a bad part of me to encourage but i’ll be damned if I weren’t giggling the whole thread
Glad to play the clown and see where the clown car would go
I was so curious to see if they’d fucking get it but no
their history of posting on Fuck AI and having one mid post here really made them think they could come in here, refuse to engage with the topic of the thread, and quadruple down on uhh the anti-AI documentary being unwatchable because it reminds them of a movie only they watched
The 1993 movie was kinda popular back in the day. I think y’all need to stop overthinking what they said and just take their actual words for face value because it is confusing if you actually knew about the 1993 film and saw this post’s title thinking that’s what they were showing.
Gotta admit I was sure they meant GiTS at first. Otherwise I would have gone with Maximum Overdrive or Lawnmower Man or something