Oh no! Whoopsie
The absence of any official government statement about the launch points to the sensitivity surrounding the program, which sits at the intersection of Russia’s commercial space ambitions, its military communications requirements, and the broader contest over satellite-based internet infrastructure that Starlink has made a strategic priority for governments worldwide.
Darn, maybe bullshitting absolutely everything including rocket design doesn’t work out in the end?
Maybe shithead oligarchs are too incompetent to be trusted to competently run space programs?
Presumably not given Starlink is working fine.
Starlink loses 400 satellites a year. Only some of those are because of planned obsolescence.
I hate Russia for invading Ukraine but this is jingoism.
They’re designed to be continuously deorbited and replaced like that.
Starlink is working fine. It’s not jingoism, you can literally buy Starlink service and it’ll work for you. SpaceX is making money on the constellation. Ukraine is using it to win the war, Russia was also using it before they got cut off and the fact that they got cut off was a major hindrance to their operations. How is any of that “jingoism?”
As I said, they’re not all done because of obsolescence. Many are deorbited because of failure, not for upgrade reasons.
I didn’t say Starlink doesn’t work. It’s jingoism because Russia loses a single satellite and it’s advertised as a huge failure. Meanwhile Starlink loses 14 satellites in 6 months to failure (not part of their standard deorbit) and its “normal business operations”.
https://www.kratosspace.com/constellations/articles/spacex-semi-annual-update-on-starlink-network-health-failure-rate-collision-risk
Rassvet is slated to eventually have as many as 900 satellites. Currently it has just 16. Well, 15.
Starlink currently has 10575 active Starlink satellites in orbit out of a planned constellation of 42000.
Losing 14 satellites to failures is indeed “normal business operations” for Starlink. Hardware fails sometimes, it’s accounted for in the business plan.
If Russia lost 14 they wouldn’t have a constellation at all any more.
SpaceX is famous for failing constantly. Musk was always tweeting before he bought Twitter about how the latest rocket failure was another learning opportunity.
Again it’s not that Starlink doesn’t work. It’s how the news is framed that makes it jingoism. Starlink lost dozens of satellites when they were first starting in 2019.
SpaceX is the largest space launch company in the world. Out of hundreds of Falcon 9 launches since 2010 only three have failed. I don’t know where this fame for “constant failure” is coming from but it seems more likely motivated by dislike of Musk than by actual statistics.
Something’s inconsistent here.
The early days of SpaceX was constant failure. 3 of the 5 Falcon 1’s failed.
Russia starts program for Starlink type program and loses 1. “Hur dur, stupid Russians.” SpaceX loses 25 in the first year of launches back in 2020 and it’s the cost of doing business, nothing to see.
It’s not the “early days” of SpaceX any more. It hasn’t been for over a decade. Nobody using SpaceX’s services today cares about Falcon 1.
I pointed out the rather significant difference between Russia’s communication satellite constellation and SpaceX’s already.