Oh no! Whoopsie
The absence of any official government statement about the launch points to the sensitivity surrounding the program, which sits at the intersection of Russia’s commercial space ambitions, its military communications requirements, and the broader contest over satellite-based internet infrastructure that Starlink has made a strategic priority for governments worldwide.
Darn, maybe bullshitting absolutely everything including rocket design doesn’t work out in the end?
Maybe shithead oligarchs are too incompetent to be trusted to competently run space programs?



SpaceX is the largest space launch company in the world. Out of hundreds of Falcon 9 launches since 2010 only three have failed. I don’t know where this fame for “constant failure” is coming from but it seems more likely motivated by dislike of Musk than by actual statistics.
Something’s inconsistent here.
The early days of SpaceX was constant failure. 3 of the 5 Falcon 1’s failed.
Russia starts program for Starlink type program and loses 1. “Hur dur, stupid Russians.” SpaceX loses 25 in the first year of launches back in 2020 and it’s the cost of doing business, nothing to see.
It’s not the “early days” of SpaceX any more. It hasn’t been for over a decade. Nobody using SpaceX’s services today cares about Falcon 1.
I pointed out the rather significant difference between Russia’s communication satellite constellation and SpaceX’s already.
Yes it’s not the early days of Space X but it is the early days of Russia’s Starlink (googling says it’s planned for 2035). During Starlink’s early days it was “we are learning” and “cost of business”. Russia loses one in a test and it’s, “they’re idiots”. That’s jingoism.