Ever since the great recession I’ve felt that the executive class are the most parasitic, regularly working against even the shareholders’ interests, let alone anyone else. Risk management is a huge part of this disconnect; these execs do not care about these downsides.
This reply is worth quoting at length:
With all due respect, I think you profoundly misunderstand the nature of my concern here.
This is not a “I do not like this distribution” kind of argument.
This is a “the people you are sending my money to want me and my friends dead or deported” kind of argument.
The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.
I have no problem with Fedora, Bluefin, Bazzite, Arch Linux, Linux Mint, Linux Foundation, LVFS, Debian, KDE… What I have a problem is with Framework consistently, repeatedly encouraging and now sponsoring individuals that have shown to be absolutely destructive to the open source community.
Claiming that this “increasing the adoption of open source software” really misses the core part of the narrative here, which is that those people have been excluded from open source communities because they were so hateful, so destructive, that their mere presence was more harmful than beneficial.
DHH is a threat to the free software community as a whole at this point. The damage he ended up doing to the Ruby community might end up outweighing entirely his contributions to Rails, which is no small feat.
Vaxry (from hyprland) was banned from freedesktop.org, wrecking havoc in standardizing Wayland protocols that the whole community could have benefited from.
If you believe helping and sponsoring those people helps the open source community, we have quite divergent views on the best way forward and, perhaps, it is best if you concentrate on making hardware and leave the open source community alone.
In any case, thanks for your quick response, @nrp, and thanks for building those awesome products.
If it’s a job function that didn’t exist 70 years ago and is not directly carceral, guaranteed it is not going to be a government employee in the USA.
if someone — whether it’s your CEO, your tech lead, or some Reddit dork — claims they’re now a 10xer because of AI, that’s almost assuredly untrue, demand they show receipts or shut the f— up.
I actually had this thought recently, that the vibecoder is the new 10xer, but in the derogatory sense of your company’s cowboy coder whipping up beautiful messes for everyone else to drown in.
Oh they have a nuance budget but they used it all up this year justifying Israeli war crimes
This Thiel interview clip is amazing
Watch Ross Douthat realize for a moment in real time that he’s spent a decade making ideological bedfellows with a techno-futurist, fascist Right that wants to see the birth of a “machine god” & is in no way enthusiastic about the survival of the human race in universal terms.
Sure there are liars but places like Hacker News are teeming with this enthusiast type.
Ezra Klein is the biggest mark on earth. His newest podcast description starts with:
Artificial general intelligence — an A.I. system that can beat humans at almost any cognitive task — is arriving in just a couple of years. That’s what people tell me — people who work in A.I. labs, researchers who follow their work, former White House officials. A lot of these people have been calling me over the last couple of months trying to convey the urgency. This is coming during President Trump’s term, they tell me. We’re not ready.
Oh, that’s what the researchers tell you? Cool cool, no need to hedge any further than that, they’re experts after all.
Read here a worthwhile deconstruction of Hanania’s bullshit by John Ganz: https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/enough
Bari Weiss, IDW star, founder of The Free Press and author of “How to Fight Anti-Semitism” publishes and then approvingly tweets excerpts from not-very-convincingly-ex white supremacist Richard Hanania explaining that
These stiff-armed salutes are not expressions of sincere Nazism but an oppositional culture that, like a rebel band that keeps wearing fatigues after victory, has failed to realize it’s no longer in the opposition.
Quite uncharacteristically, she deleted her tweet in shame, but not before our friend TracingWoodgrains signal boosted it, adding “Excellent, timely article from Hanania.” His favorite excerpt, unsurprisingly, is Hanania patiently explaining that open Nazism is not “a winning political strategy.” Better to insinuate your racism with sophistication!
Shortly after, realizing he needed to even out his light criticism of his fascist comrades, Woodgrains posted about “vile populism to right of me, vile populism to left of me”, with the latter being the Luigi fandom (no citation that this is leftist, and contrary to the writings of Luigi). To his mind the latter is worse “because there is a vanishingly short path between it and more political murders in the short-term future”, whereas open Nazism at the highest levels of the American conservative movement doesn’t hurt anyone [important].
I’ve used this before: https://song.link/i/1169243537
True Anon podcast (began with dissecting the Jeffrey Epstein case) goes deep on Luigi, his shooting, and his grey tribe ideological background. https://www.patreon.com/posts/episode-425-blue-118079355
Worthy read, but it smelled like it had been drafted by AI too. Lots of the tropes and a bit repetitive.