I am currently winding down the Mastodon bots I used to post sunrise and sunset times. The precipitating event is that the admin of the instance hosting the associated accounts demanded they be made nigh-undiscoverable, but the underlying cause is that it’s become increasing clear that Mastodon isn’t, and won’t ever be, a good platform for “asynchronous ephemeral notifications of any kind”. I’d also argue (more controversially) that it’s simply not good infrastructure for social networking of any kind. There are lots of interesting people using Mastodon, and I’m sure it will live on as a good-enough space for certain niche groups. But there is no question that it will never offer the fun of early Twitter, let alone the vibrancy of Twitter during its growth phase. I’ve long since dropped Mastodon from my home screen, and have switched to Bluesky for text-centric social media

Federation does not work I’m not saying federation “won’t” work or “can’t” work. Merely that in 2025, nine years after deployment, federation does not work for the Mastodon use case.

I could opine at length about possible federated architectures and what I think the ActivityPub people clearly got wrong in hindsight.1 But the proof is in the pudding: Mastodon simply doesn’t show users the posts they ask to see, as I quickly

  • rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    would be a very poor substitute most likely

    • phanpy is already doing it for Mastodon, and there are plenty of people satisfied with it.
    • You have no idea how far one can go by getting a generic training model and fine-tuning on the device
    • we don’t need to have something a perfect replacement. We just need “good enough”.
    • even if it is not perfect, it is better than the nothing that reactionary “no algorithm in the Fediverse!” crowd is bringing to the table.

    That is just not helpful at all, because it destroys the very foundation of what the Fediverse tries to achieve.

    Says who? You and the gatekeepers who’d rather have everyone stuck in the past, just to preserve some technical/ideological purity?

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      You are mixing up two topics here. If someone wants to experiment with a local only algorithmic feed that’s fine, but I can practically guarantee that this will never be enough to convince people to switch from TikTok and the like.

      And the other topic is about commercialization. You are the one stuck in the past thinking that is the only way for the Fediverse to succeed. Quite on the contrary, if anyone seriously tried that it would fail quickly and just result in burned investments and a lot of goodwill towards the Fediverse lost.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Quite on the contrary, if anyone seriously tried that it would fail quickly and just result in burned investments

        What do you think that Automattic, Flipboard and Ghost are doing? Do you think they are paying people to develop integrations with AP because they are really nice people and have zero intentions of profiting from their investments?

        Look, I better leave this conversation. I should have learned by now that there is no point in arguing with ideologues.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          The problem is that you are the ideologue but fail to realize that. Capitalism is an ideology and a very harmful one.

          As for those investments, lets see, but I don’t expect much to come from those.