• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They are highly susceptible to gound fire, manpads, any type of AA, and some attack drones. However given their cost, a plane making 1-2 successful attacks before being shot down more than justifies their cost.

    This is why Ukraine taking out radars, AA, AWACS aircraft, jammers and other sensors is so important, SEAD works because it lets you drop the price per strike package as enemy air defense capability falls through the floor. Note the opposite is happening with Ukraine’s Air Defense, they are forcing russia to equip shaheds with jet engines to be effective.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppression_of_enemy_air_defenses

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      SEAD for these relatively large fragile slow moving planes is pretty difficult. The U.S lost over 400 in similar role to ground fire in Vietnam. Mostly downed by direct fire 0.50cal machine guns or small arms from what I can find.

      That being said:

      These are a very cheap answer to long range highly mobile heavy artillery or front-line dug in positions with very low risk to Ukraines operators.