You do you. But I wouldn’t trust anyone on the sole basis that they claim they subscribe to a specific ideology. That has to be the dumbest shit I’ve heard today.
But I wouldn’t trust anyone on the sole basis that they claim they subscribe to a specific ideology.
Almost as dumb as rejecting someone based on their ideology alone? Or do you have any resources to prove their journalism is biased apart from that “they are socialists”. You have been out here for days shitting on this news paper “Flamman” that you yourself have admitted to hearing for the first time
Nor have I ever heard of this publication “Flamman”, that also claims to be some old socialist newspaper.
You have not presented a single source as to why they are biased apart from them being “socialists”. You have also been going around trying to shit on other resources as much as you can, blaming people of not providing enough resources and saying things like “misinformation is how propaganda spreads”. These are all applications of the “accusation in the mirror”.
I did thanks (and agree with ethical media violations presented here). The very fact that they are audited by a media ombudsmen however goes on to prove that your statement
“Flamman” however is closer to Alex Jones Info Wars
does not hold up. And the fact that nothing they have said in the previous article (i.e “parasites” or the donations) was fabricated remains.
I trust socialists way more than I trust capitalists. Socialists want to liberate the world, capitalists want to enslave it.
You do you. But I wouldn’t trust anyone on the sole basis that they claim they subscribe to a specific ideology. That has to be the dumbest shit I’ve heard today.
Almost as dumb as rejecting someone based on their ideology alone? Or do you have any resources to prove their journalism is biased apart from that “they are socialists”. You have been out here for days shitting on this news paper “Flamman” that you yourself have admitted to hearing for the first time
You have not presented a single source as to why they are biased apart from them being “socialists”. You have also been going around trying to shit on other resources as much as you can, blaming people of not providing enough resources and saying things like “misinformation is how propaganda spreads”. These are all applications of the “accusation in the mirror”.
Sure. Have i rejected something on the sole basis of someones ideology? No.
The fact they are a political publication means by definition that they’re biased.
If they weren’t, they’d be politically neutral.
It’s sad, that this has to be explained to you.
I did indeed hear about them for the first time recently, and the more i learned about them. The worse it got. They’re not considered reliable
Yes you have rejected the credibility of a publisher you have encountered for the first time solely based on their ideology.
Provide resources about what you have learned about them.
https://medieombudsmannen.se/beslut/flamman-klandras-for-skadande-rattelse-om-skolentreprenoren-barbara-bergstrom/
https://medieombudsmannen.se/beslut/mediernas-etiknamnd-klandrar-flamman-for-text-i-nyhetsbrev/
Enjoy
I did thanks (and agree with ethical media violations presented here). The very fact that they are audited by a media ombudsmen however goes on to prove that your statement
does not hold up. And the fact that nothing they have said in the previous article (i.e “parasites” or the donations) was fabricated remains.
If you want to read way more stupid things you can read your own posts.