I did thanks (and agree with ethical media violations presented here). The very fact that they are audited by a media ombudsmen however goes on to prove that your statement
“Flamman” however is closer to Alex Jones Info Wars
does not hold up. And the fact that nothing they have said in the previous article (i.e “parasites” or the donations) was fabricated remains.
Sure. Have i rejected something on the sole basis of someones ideology? No.
The fact they are a political publication means by definition that they’re biased.
If they weren’t, they’d be politically neutral.
It’s sad, that this has to be explained to you.
I did indeed hear about them for the first time recently, and the more i learned about them. The worse it got. They’re not considered reliable
Yes you have rejected the credibility of a publisher you have encountered for the first time solely based on their ideology.
Provide resources about what you have learned about them.
https://medieombudsmannen.se/beslut/flamman-klandras-for-skadande-rattelse-om-skolentreprenoren-barbara-bergstrom/
https://medieombudsmannen.se/beslut/mediernas-etiknamnd-klandrar-flamman-for-text-i-nyhetsbrev/
Enjoy
I did thanks (and agree with ethical media violations presented here). The very fact that they are audited by a media ombudsmen however goes on to prove that your statement
does not hold up. And the fact that nothing they have said in the previous article (i.e “parasites” or the donations) was fabricated remains.