• Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      It isn’t an option. Canada would have to withdraw their support for the ICC, if they were to ignore one of their rulings. Carney can’t just decide to do that on his own. It would need to be legislated.

      • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Wait so are you saying that ICC rulings are in fact enforced by the judicial branch (like any other arrest warrants) and not the executive? That would be great because I was just about to lament on here that they seem to depend on the willingness of the executive in most countries. Which is the precise reason why we leave law enforcement to a separate branch

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        They would just “forget” about arresting him or purposefully started some kind of long procedural judicial consultation (“something, something, Diplomatic Immunity”), for long enough that Carney had time to properly lick Netanyahu’s arse and the latter left Canada.

        Following that there would be some theatrical political performances on the theme “we could never imagine this could happen” including some deeply emotional “lessons were learned” at the end for that oh so very special “we’re really genuinelly sorry and this will never happens again (until it does)” juice.

        • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          My point was that this is not a decision that Carney can make, unilaterally. By law, Canada is obligated to arrest him if he comes to Canada. Which means “Carney being Carney” has nothing to do with it. Canada would have to not only change its domestic laws…they would have to redefine their alignment with international laws.

  • huppakee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Isn’t basically all of Africa and Asia supporting his arrest? I feel this map made every country not part of the western world grey, as in ‘we dont now the data or don’t care about it’.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Realistically, there’s likely a diplomatic arrangement that he’s given safe passage for negotiations. One might argue, however, that he could be classified as an enemy combatant, and just shot on sight - no arrest needed.

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I assume the map is excluding all the countries where he’d just instantly be chopped up on sight instead of arrested and handed over to the ICC.

      Seriously though, I assume this is only for countries that would enforce the ICC warrant. He’s probably a wanted man in lots of countries. In reality this map is actually way redder than this.

  • Kraiden@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Where is this data from? I seriously doubt NZs current thumb in chief has the stones to remove his tongue from Trumps ass long enough to arrest Netanyahu

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      This is the cool thing about NZ. They’re so geographically out of play, they can do/say whatever, geopolitically, without anyone caring.

      What’s someone gonna do? Go fight them out in the carpark ten blocks away just to get absolutely nothing out of it?

      I think the only time they upset someone was when they disallowed bringing nuclear vessels and aircraft into their territory.

      USA: “You’ll regret that.”
      NZ: “Meh…”

      Three decades on, NZ still just chillin’. No need for the protection of the Pacific fleet lol

  • Egonallanon@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    What defines absolute readiness in this case? For example I know Starmer said the UK would honour its commitments to the Rome statute and arrest Nehtanyahu if he entered the UK.

  • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is there a bounty? If anyone wants to help, we can split it equally. I promise not to predictably change my mind once we get out deep into the canyon.

  • LaoiseFu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ireland wouldn’t arrest they’d get down on their knees and take a long drunk of water. Pucker up