• Gork@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Cool. I don’t usually see the raw sausage making results, usually I just see whatever news article reports it and sometimes mangle’s the statistics.

    • TRBoom@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I went through it and it seems to indicate the opposite of what the article says? Did I miss something?

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        here’s the summary table that the article pulled its numbers from

        here’s a specific question regarding AI

        • TRBoom@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Thank you! There was another section that had different numbers and I was just looking at raw numbers as well.

        • samvines@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          I hate the framing here “the risks outweigh.the benefits” is critihype. The survey maker shouldn’t be reinforcing the general population’s assumption that spicy autocomplete means that AGI is nigh.

          Although I guess when framed as “spicy autocorrect trained on classic sci-fi tropes like terminator being in charge of making kill decisions” the risk framing makes more sense but I don’t think I’m going out on a limb here to suggest that this is not how average Joe is going to mentally frame the question