Estonia is the latest preparing to find a Microsoft alternative

    • Jack@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, but we also should avoid just building monopolies like in the US. There will be no gain to just replace one tech overlord with another.

      The future is open source.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Which I think is largely what you’re seeing happen. France’s national options are all built on open source for example.

      • Greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The main issue with AWS and GCP and Azure is they’re effectively a triopoly controlled by the Americans.

        We need to dump a fat stack into a plurality of providers, ideally operating as national champions.

        Something atop of OpenStack maybe. But OpenStack seems bloated as fuck.

        • Jack@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Overall agree but “The market” created this problem. We cannot rely on it to solve it.

          We need open standards, and lowering the barriers to entry, not creating “the European Google” or “the AWS of France”.

          A book vaguely related to the topic is “the internet con” by Cory Doctorow. He explains how google and aws didn’t just “happen” but are a product and the beneficiary of a process of erosion of antitrust laws.