• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    I don’t think that it has a lot of direct relevance for Ukraine. The two projects in question (tsunami weapon on a torpedo for undersea delivery, nuclear-powered cruise missile) will exist to try to retain a credibile delivery platform for Russia’s nuclear deterrent in the face of US anti-ICBM stuff. The idea would be that if the US does a first strike on Russia, the US couldn’t necessarily intercept all of the response if the response includes unconventional delivery platforms.

    EDIT: I’d also add that I’m skeptical that they’re going to be very reliable themselves as a counter to the US — I am very comfortable saying that if the US can shoot down fast-moving aircraft and counter submarines capable of firing depressed-trajectory SLBMs, that that it can probably manage to counter nuclear-powered cruise missiles and intercontinental nuclear torpedoes. Still, adding a new delivery platform might impose asymmetric costs on the US. Easier to develop a system that can shoot a bullet at someone than to develop one that can reliably shoot it out of the air mid-flight.