As an avid (ab)user of phrases-as-lemmata, I found this interesting.
Discovered through YouTube: Linguists just made a breakthrough in defining a 'word. ’ No, really
As an avid (ab)user of phrases-as-lemmata, I found this interesting.
Discovered through YouTube: Linguists just made a breakthrough in defining a 'word. ’ No, really
To me as a native speaker, 1c is ungrammatical. I do agree that 2a is surprisingly grammatical though.
I will say grammar is really not my strong suit (and I only had time to skim the paper) but I have a decent background in semantics. Maybe I’ve just been working a lot with euphemisms lately, but PALs almost seem to function like euphemisms?
As if they were replacing some word, right? Except the word might not exist in this case.