• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    The term AI is so worthless to begin with because it has no real definition. I would personally say that its “anything involving machine learning” but that defintion doesnt actually have anything to do with being “artificially intelligent” so it also makes no sense.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Anything involving machine learning” also has nothing to do with “classical AI,” which was basically just gigantic piles of if statements.

    • 8uurg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It does have a dictionary entry though, e.g. "the branch of computer science that deal with writing computer programs that can solve problems creatively”, and I would argue that this definition fits.

      The definition “something that lets a computer perform tasks that are thought to require intelligence” depends on the person, and whether they think something required a form of intelligence. Accounting for all variables over a large distance so you hit your target seems like it requires a reasonable amount of intelligence to me.

      It is a extremely generic term though, almost like using ‘software package’. It is more often used as a buzzword than something that provides significant clarification about how it works.