Never mind the issue of incorrect political bias classification, is political bias a bannable offense? That seems to be the prompt focus being used.

This may happen afterall. EU now moving to end its “economic partnership” structure since 2000 over already determined human rights abuse that violate agreement and give cause for termination.

Are you confusing Diamond mining? Rare earth mining is highly industrialized. Fun fact, Chinese synthetic diamonds are putting children/blood traders out of work.

simpler version, importing more renewables is more job creation than deploying less total renewables to protect Russian uranium imports or US oil/LNG imports. National security can be addressed without bans.

Electronics can have some component of manual, relatively low skilled, assembly, but most of it is highly automated. If you desperately need a lot of domestic low skill jobs, then stop importing shoes and apparel.

First, doing uncompetitive things in general lowers national welfare. Specifically in productivity enhancing sectors such as energy, it further means competitive disadvantage. Importing cheaper renewable components creates a lot of domestic deployment work, including the scaffolding and installation.

As a national security measure, the US colony middle powers should join together on firmware development/verification, and favour open source firmware. US inverters for retail market are surprisingly expensive while still made in Asia, and would be suspect of having extra circuitry in them. Modular hardware that allows to plug in separate remote control/networking/bluetooth modules with open firmware.

Just saying “China bad” is a traitorous loser move. Renewables are energy security because of no fuel (subscription) reliance. Allowing US gas/combustion turbines is a bigger security risk from closed source CIA champion firmware. Enriched uranium and centrifuges is dominated by Russian tech. Tolerating US permission for oil access is biggest loser move ever.

Treating global warming as something that must be dominated by US Empire colonies economically is ensuring maximum global warming, because US empire was always going to force extortionist dead ender energy climate terrorism on its slaves.

nuclear power is very geopolitically sensitive and very expensive. It is a target to get Chernobyled if war or civil unrest happens.

Could only read 1st paragraph. From Fortune’s Zionist/Empire agenda… Russia.

It is Europe’s alliance with US that has made all of its energy shocks. Nordstream was a US devotion hari kari. US played a somewhere between extreme and 100% role in puppeting Ukraine to war against Russia (Nordstream 2 was created specifically because of a nazified Ukraine demanding higher transit fees), and forcing its colonial rulers to give you Russophobia.

Going back to 2021 Russia-EU relations would be obviously best for EU, and understanding that US/Israel was its real enemy all along, but especially in contempt for global economy this month, is key to EU future, but whatever source has cheapest energy (It is China by far) is path to minimizing energy shocks. Geopolitically sensitive energy reliance is the achiles heal that will always be used to extort EU/world/people.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2519845123 the apendix is downloadable with the math of their algorithm. I’m bad with such notation though.

Yes. The structure of the deal, with 20% revenue royalty, in addition to 20% ownership, leaves 0 possible chance of any profit. Only Zionist supremacist control of media can be motive.

Not reasonable to call him pro Russian with his nonsense views that “NATO is not a threat”, “Russia will lose the war, and is targetting irrelevant buildings”, or to humanize in any way CIA puppetted Ukrainian rulership and its antagonism and war provocation. Democracy is advanced by exterminating worthless divisive fraudulent scum.

That there are unhappy people in Russia suffering hardship is fair and reasonable, and corruption should be controlled. That Russia has options to alleviate hardships is fair, but fraudlent traitorous nonsense should not be tolerated anywhere in the world, and it harms his credibility regarding other concerns.

I got all data from this article

The data regarding the business confidence comes from Russian panelists. These are Russian entrepreneurs.

Yes PMI is 47. Below 50 is contraction. 47 is higher than US numbers. Mild contraction from very overheated levels is still a healthy economy. 16% interest rates are down from 21%, and likely to drop more. Russia has managed the good problem of wage increases being higher than inflation, which is unheard of under our fascism.

This is coming off “overheated levels” last year, and only down 0.7% year over year. If Russophobia propaganda drives US colony happiness, peace in Ukraine with commitments by Russia to reduce military production would create a difficult economic transition in Russia with more opportunity for such headlines, and perhaps Germany and Japan having a chance to surpass it in PPP GDP rankings again.

US looks bigger than Canada in this map. It isn’t.

There’s a scam by large companies, Apple included, where pricing globally is based on US prices. Even with tariffs by US on everyone, and no tarriffs in US colonies, companies boost prices everywhere to subsidize US customers. Our colonial governments say nothing.

Private employment is very well paid, because military pay is so high. Inflation in Russia is led by wages.

They passed Germany and Japan since 2022. Weekly progress in SMO is constant and accelerating.

Full throated support for SMO necessity. Russia has moved up to 4th largest PPP GDP in world. Extremely high employment rate at high pay. The threat highlight is less about any impending collapse, but a call for greater centralization. Russia will have a difficult transition to peace after victory, and it’s possible that this is a call to maintain the economic pluralism created by the SMO.

Why does the live free or die state always have less liberal laws than its Vermont neighbour?

Every state is positive! score is favourable - unfavourable. Hawaii would have been 76.5 vs 23.5.