• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 31st, 2023

help-circle

  • The 3 stooges-style robber confrontation and the death of caesar feel like a very young child’s recreation of a story they overheard from adults; very little basis in reality and full of nonsensical assumptions. Or like when a kid is trying to write a story and they come up with “Space Wars: The Fellowship of the Lightsaber, part 2: the Klingon Horcruxes”.

    It’s cute when a kid does it, it’s hilarious when an adult does it intentionally. This is just sad.






  • I swear these dudes really need to supplement their Ayn Rand with some Terry Pratchett…

    “All right," said Susan. “I’m not stupid. You’re saying humans need… fantasies to make life bearable.”

    REALLY? AS IF IT WAS SOME KIND OF PINK PILL? NO. HUMANS NEED FANTASY TO BE HUMAN. TO BE THE PLACE WHERE THE FALLING ANGEL MEETS THE RISING APE.

    “Tooth fairies? Hogfathers? Little—”

    YES. AS PRACTICE. YOU HAVE TO START OUT LEARNING TO BELIEVE THE LITTLE LIES.

    “So we can believe the big ones?”

    YES. JUSTICE. MERCY. DUTY. THAT SORT OF THING.

    “They’re not the same at all!”

    YOU THINK SO? THEN TAKE THE UNIVERSE AND GRIND IT DOWN TO THE FINEST POWDER AND SIEVE IT THROUGH THE FINEST SIEVE AND THEN SHOW ME ONE ATOM OF JUSTICE, ONE MOLECULE OF MERCY. AND YET—Death waved a hand. AND YET YOU ACT AS IF THERE IS SOME IDEAL ORDER IN THE WORLD, AS IF THERE IS SOME…SOME RIGHTNESS IN THE UNIVERSE BY WHICH IT MAY BE JUDGED.

    “Yes, but people have got to believe that, or what’s the point—”

    MY POINT EXACTLY.”

    Hogfather






  • How feasible is it to configure my server to essentially perform a reverse-slow-lorris attack on these LLM bots?

    If they won’t play nice, then we need to reflect their behavior back onto themselves.

    Or perhaps serve a 404, 304 or some other legitimate-looking static response that minimizes load on my server whilst giving then least amount of data to train on.


  • Jayjader@jlai.lutoTechTakes@awful.systemsNever Forgive Them
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Good stuff near the end:

    I will never forgive these people for what they’ve done to the computer, and the more I learn about both their intentions and actions the more certain I am that they are unrepentant and that their greed will never be sated.

    These men lace our digital lives with asbestos and get told they’re geniuses for doing so because money comes out.

    I care about you. The user. The person reading this. The person that may have felt stupid, or deficient, or ignorant, all because the services you pay for or that monetize you have been intentionally rigged against you.

    You aren’t the failure. The services, the devices, and the executives are.

    I don’t feel like Zitron completely addressed my remark in the parent comment, but the end result/destination is the same.


  • Jayjader@jlai.lutoTechTakes@awful.systemsNever Forgive Them
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Where The Rot Economy separates is that growth is, in and of itself, the force that drives companies to enshittify.

    Not finished reading the article yet, but my reaction to reading this line is that Zitron is missing the mark in the same way he qualifies Doctorow’s Enshittification does.

    I don’t think growth directly drives companies to enshittify. Rather, infinite (and especially constant-or-better) growth in a finite space is only possible when things degrade. Physical widgets do this pretty decently on their own, though we (humans) had to come up with planned obsolescence to keep degradation above a certain threshhold. Software, on the other hand, doesn’t naturally degrade over time. It only seems to do so because the different actors in its ecosystem, from the software “bricks” to the underlying hardware, are similarly incentivized to churn out new things that deprecate the old, indirectly degrading them.

    We’ll see where Zitron goes from here to the end of the article.