• Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    It doesn’t seem to line up very well with where the radioactive material from the disaster landed, save for in the most general sense of “more in the east”. Of the countries included in this dataset, if Chernobyl was the cause then you’d expect much higher rates in Finland, Sweden, and Austria and much lower rates in the Baltics

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        It doesn’t look that close to me

        • Finland: lowest death rate on the southern coast, which is almost the country’s highest Chernobyl exposure

        • Poland: almost an inverse correlation within the country, not to mention that it got one of the highest doses overall but isn’t particularly high on the death rates

        • Bulgaria and Hungary: low exposures, very high death rates

        • Turkiye and Georgia: high death rates, little to no exposure

        Like, yes, there is a general correlation of more east = higher death rates and also higher doses, but there’s too much other stuff going on in the details for that to be the explanation by itself

        • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          We’ll have to wait for other peer reviewed research for causation. Still wouldn’t shock me of there was some link.