grue@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoEFF is promoting the Fediverse!join.eff.orgexternal-linkmessage-square83linkfedilinkarrow-up1465arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: lemmy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1461arrow-down1external-linkEFF is promoting the Fediverse!join.eff.orggrue@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square83linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: lemmy@lemmy.ml
minus-squareryper@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up85·2 months agoThey also have a Mastodon account: @eff@mastodon.social
minus-squareSéimhe (sé / é)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up46arrow-down4·2 months agoWhere they get absolutely roasted for their stance on AI 😄
minus-squareTwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·2 months agoTheir correct stance that copyright doesn’t protect rights holders from training AI on content scraped legally.
minus-squareikt@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down8·2 months agomastoholes at it again
minus-squaremjr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·2 months agoMaybe, but their stance on AI does suck.
minus-squareikt@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down3·2 months agoWhat is their stance on AI?
minus-squarePieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·edit-22 months agoCopyright doesn’t protect from training on data that was scraped legally. Which is exactly the stance I would expect from EFF, since their primary goal is an open and free internet. Scraping is a normal activity if you ascribe to that ethos.
minus-squarevercetti@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoOnly stupid people support copyright and patent laws.
minus-squarerealcaseyrollins@hilariouschaos.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·2 months agoY’all remind me of Republicans asking if the actors in a movie are Democrats before they decide whether or not to watch it. Give it a rest.
They also have a Mastodon account: @eff@mastodon.social
Where they get absolutely roasted for their stance on AI 😄
Their correct stance that copyright doesn’t protect rights holders from training AI on content scraped legally.
mastoholes at it again
Maybe, but their stance on AI does suck.
What is their stance on AI?
Copyright doesn’t protect from training on data that was scraped legally.
Which is exactly the stance I would expect from EFF, since their primary goal is an open and free internet. Scraping is a normal activity if you ascribe to that ethos.
Only stupid people support copyright and patent laws.
Y’all remind me of Republicans asking if the actors in a movie are Democrats before they decide whether or not to watch it. Give it a rest.