- Do you have an idea for a new community? (It would be helpful if you provide some detail about what the community would be focused on and what sort of posts it would contain)
- Do you have a suggested name for the community? (not required, but if you have an idea, feel free to share)
- Do you have a suggested instance/server for the community? (some servers have significantly different views on different topics)
- Are you willing to be a mod of this community? (not to pressure you, just to provide support, if indicated)
Also, let us know if you have any suggestions about this community or post.
Thanks to @stuartml@piefed.social for starting the ball rolling on these types of posts.
I recall some communities have their own wiki. I don’t recall if its a feature for one of the threadiverse software or an add on that specific community made (something to look into).
I believe a few instances do demographic surveys. Given the wide dispersion of people on different instances I’m not sure how reflective that will be to the threadiverse as a whole, but I think, worth investigating regardless. Thanks for the suggestion.
Can you expand on “a certain amount of content is best dribbled to them”? I’m having trouble following what you mean.
I think that’s a great suggestion for communities to have regular posts in that style.
I don’t have any attachment to “community”, beyond it already being the standard. That being said I think any replacement would need to be universal and not software dependent (Lemmy/sublemmy, piefed/subpie). I think software dependent terms would just be needless confusing for new people and an added burden to learn the difference(s).
I never used web forums much, can you expand on “but things I might expect in those places (the usual avatars, usual talking heads, mutual help) I rarely find here”? What are talking heads and mutual help in regards to forums?
Piefed has per-community wiki
I was pretty sure it was a Piefed feature, but hadn’t looked it up yet. Thanks for the heads up :)
You’re welcome!
Oh, I mean that simply an interesting picture, thought or link can be enough for a post. For example, if I have a dozen post-worthy images along the same theme, they don’t need to all be uploaded to Imgur or PixelFed, then collected in to a single post. Instead, they can be dribbled in to twelve different posts over time. Because it’s primarily a casual, doom-scrolling audience, so it’s probably better for one’s sanity to err on the side of casualness when posting. Also, it helps prevent burnout.
I don’t think that’s practical. Just a frank, warts-'n-all description of the standard FV community in the theoretical guide to help community-starters avoid possible delusions.
My experience with forums is that you tend to bump in to the same people a lot, making it more of a true community experience. People who are friendly in those situations often wind up learning about each other and helping each other out when possible.
With the Reddit model, it’s more like strangers dropping in and dropping out all day long, day after day, so it seems much rarer to see the same people, learn about them, and build much sense of community in that sense. It’s more of a hive mind IME. Even a single conversion is commonly a chain of multiple people keeping the conversation going, even though at first glance it just seems like two people chatting. I found that pretty weird at first, but it eventually became normal for me.
Gotcha. Appreciate the clarification.
I’m not sure we are talking about the same thing. This is what to call a community/sublemmy/magazine (thanks for the reminder @Kierunkowy74@kbin.social), correct? I think 1 universal term for the threadiverse would be more efficient, but I really don’t care. I do expect “sub-” anything is probably going to be a tough sell, with push back coming from anti-Reddit users.
Thanks for the further description. Yeah, I think “multiple people keeping the conversation going” is just the nature of the beast, with Reddit-like link aggregates. Although, I do notice the same names in posts regularly and have had some long one-on-one discussions, without additional people joining the fray.
Yeah, I’m kinda lost, myself. The internal terms for “community” (and equivalents) aren’t going to change, so I’m only talking about how to best understand what they are.
Personally, I’m not trying to push any particular term on anyone. I use “SubLemmy”, “SubPie”, “comm” and “/c” because they feel more natural / appropriate, that’s all. If that kind of usage picks up with others, then I might just wind up reverting to “sub” because it’s easier and already well-known from Reddit.
I don’t know that anti-Reddit users would have a problem with “sub.” I’m thinking most of them very much liked the overall Reddit format and terminology, but they left because of shitty administration, moderation, and stuff like that. In reality, I bet most of us wish that the Fediverse was more robust with features like Reddit, but with less draconian management.
I figured we had a miscommunication. Thanks for clarifying and I think you are right with adding that language to any on-boarding guide/wiki.
You could very well be right. It’s distinctly possible I’ve simply run into too many anti-reddit users and they’re simply a small vocal minority rather than a plurality of the users.
/kbin has always called them “magazines” (and MBin retains the name as its fork).