Disclosure: I maintain ThoughtDAG.

While using local models for research, I kept running into a simple problem: once a paper, hypothesis, or mistaken branch enters a chat, it tends to remain in later context even after I have mentally moved on.

I built ThoughtDAG to test a more explicit interaction model.

Each question, answer, and source is a node. The wires determine exactly which upstream nodes are serialized into the model’s next request.

Delete a wire, regenerate the same prompt, and that branch remains visible on the canvas but disappears from the actual model input.

It currently supports Ollama and OpenAI-compatible endpoints. Canvases, documents, and API keys are stored locally.

I am less interested in general promotion than in whether this interaction is actually useful for people running local models:

• Would manual context pruning be worth the effort with smaller context windows?
• Would you prefer automatic suggestions followed by human confirmation?
• What would you need to inspect before trusting the selected context?

I am also turning these questions into a small context-control benchmark, so failure cases are especially useful.

Website: https://chenxiachan.github.io/thoughtdag/