• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fun Fact! Julius Caesar, of dictator and conqueror fame, highly praised these Gallic-made walls as being resistant to siege weapons. Respect from a foe!

    This work, with respect to appearance and variety, is not unsightly, owing to the alternate rows of beams and stones, which preserve their order in right lines; and, besides, it possesses great advantages as regards utility and the defense of cities; for the stone protects it from fire, and the wood from the battering ram, since it [the wood] being mortised in the inside with rows of beams, generally forty feet each in length, can neither be broken through nor torn asunder.

    • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Caesar had good reason to hype up the Gallic defenses, since he beat them. Writing about how good they were was meant to increase his own game.

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Certainly true!

        Even so, his praise of Gallic craftsmanship and cunning offers us rare and valuable insight into details about ‘barbarians’ other ‘civilized’ authors of the time considered too trivial or mundane to mention, many of which have been backed by archeological evidence - Gallic wall construction included!

        • Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I think a ditch would be more of what was used back then. Most sieges were not engineering attacks but rather brute force attacks.

          • tomiant@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Oh for sure, I meant a ditch, to me a moat can also be a ditch. Definitely have a ditch. Several. You can’t have too few.

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I most certainly would not want them to do that! That’s like, my least favorite thing to have done to my settlement walls!

  • Gork@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Looks like it could probably even survive a cannon shot to some extent. Might breach the stone but all that earth will absorb the impact.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Seems like the protruding ends of those logs would make this wall easier to climb than you’d want.

    Still not super easy, of course, but if an enemy was trying to sneak in or assault the wall, it seems like that would give them nice convenient handholds for most of the way up.

  • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    My understanding is that the classic Incan, fitted-stone walls worked similarly. Very impressive work on the exactingly-cut, huge outer stones, but the insides filled with Barney Rubble, etc.