• pageflight@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is it accurate to understand this as putting the lungs’ immune response into a heightened state of response/alert? It doesn’t sound like it’s training the immune system about specific pathogens (or families of them). If that’s true, why doesn’t the body just do this already — is there a cost associated?

    • Levi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was thinking the same thing. There probably is a downside to having the innate immune system active 24/7, even if we don’t know what it is yet.

      A magical nasal spray that gets rid of allergies for 3 months sure does sound nice though.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Active macrophages can damage healthy cells. It’s a very serious condition when they do, and it can lead to runaway cellular death. It doesn’t mean that this treatment will cause MAS, but it’s a risk that should be investigated with human trials.

      It also has a metabolic cost, in that the active cells consume energy and oxygen, but I don’t know if it would be a noticeable effect for the average person.

      My guess is that this would be something you use when you are at increased risk for cold and flu. Like nurses and doctors, teachers and childcare workers, and nursing home staff during the fall and winter.

      • Kirp123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, active macrophages will release cytokines and other inflammatory substances. Prolonged inflammation is linked with increased rates of cancer.

      • Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        I refuse to get flu shots simply because I’d rather feel like shit and sit at home for a few days than go to work.

        But I still get paid for those days, people in less developed countries don’t, so have only the option to work while sick or get the jab and work. Or starve.

              • Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Considering we get all the sick days we need and get paid for them all, it’s a small price to pay (doctors visit is paid for by the employer). This is separate from our 5 weeks of paid holidays each year.

        • pageflight@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I was hesitant to get the vaccine when I was just making a personal tradeoff. Seeing the whole “flatten the curve” catastrophe of COVID, and the resurgence of measles now, I think the major benefit is herd immunity / protecting vulnerable individuals.