It’s their only service, they make money by customers paying them to host their photos. They don’t subsidise by crawling through all of your photos, mails, documents and then use that information to display Search and YouTube ads getting money from advertisement seals.
If its too expensive for you then it’s what it is, but it’s unrealistic to expect small scale competitors to outperform big tech offerings on every front.
It’s their only service, they make money by customers paying them to host their photos. They don’t subsidise by crawling through all of your photos, mails, documents and then use that information to display Search and YouTube ads getting money from advertisement seals.
If its too expensive for you then it’s what it is, but it’s unrealistic to expect small scale competitors to outperform big tech offerings on every front.
You are off course absolutely correct.
I have started lately to pay extra to get the service/quality/production location I want. So why should this be any exception.
Thanks for reminding me