• ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Are there any chocolate companies with well-documented supply chains that don’t use child labor, slave labor, or otherwise exploit cocoa producers? Because everything I’ve seen and heard tells me that its best to just not eat chocolate at all.

  • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Be careful of Cadbury, for those considering.

    In the US it is mostly Hershey’s, everywhere else it’s fine.

    • skepller@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There are a lot of European brands missing on that website, and judging by the plethora of random small American ones, I assume it’s probably because it’s made by an American.

      It also weirdly puts Tony’s in the boycott section, when it’s basically the only big brand trying to actively change their whole supply chain (there’s still progress to be made, but putting it alongside Nestlé? really?).

      In any way, it’s good advice in the end.

      • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        https://www.slavefreechocolate.org/news/2023/12/11/no-tonys-is-still-not-on-the-slave-free-chocolate-orgs-list-of-ethical-suppliers

        Despite numerous announced initiatives by companies profiting from child and slave labor, none have produced meaningful results. The underlying issue is the inability to ensure a true living wage for farmers, leading them to resort to unpaid child labor, while the industry strives to keep cacao prices at rock bottom.

        The conclusion is clear: consumer-facing marketing claims unravel to reveal no substantial impact, leaving consumers susceptible to being “brandwashed.” Until significant tangible changes are witnessed or an assurance of ethical practices throughout their operations is evident, Tony’s Chocolonely remains excluded from the list.

        They at least give a reason for Tony’s to be on the boycott list. But then again, this is the last “news” article they published and it’s now over two years old, so who can really say.

        • Chais@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          But doesn’t that apply just as much to Fairtrade and other, similar certifications? Tony’s is Fairtrade certified. Seems weird to give Fairtrade as a guide for brands not on the list but then exclude one specifically.

      • Chais@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Oh, I did not catch that. It’s entirely possible that Tony’s being on the boycott list is based on outdated information. As far as I know it’s just one person maintaining the page. I think you can also contact them.

  • KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I can’t recommend Tony’s Chocolonely enough since they are the only chocolate maker [ I know of ] that actively tries to act against exploitation of cocoa farmers by paying a higher price per kilo. There is a John Oliver Episode on them :)

    • gramie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Definition of a conundrum: the only place around me that sells Tony’s chocolate is Wal-Mart.

    • OrlandoDoom@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They are great, here in my hometown (Nottingham, UK) we have a little place called Louisa’s, and as far as I’m aware, she’s the only vegan chocolate maker in the UK. She does direct trade with small family farms so that everyone gets paid fairly (direct trade > fair trade), she also knows a lot about the cocoa plant and so will visit her farmers to help them grow better beans and ensure these farms are run in an ethical fashion.

      Her chocolate is absolutely divine too, if you can, order from her.

      Warning, it’s pricey, but hopefully you’ll understand why!

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      They also make good fucking chocolate.

      Head and shoulders above most other crap, especially the ones on the top of the picture.

    • Chais@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      My only gripe is that it’s impossible to break off two equal pieces, which makes sharing needlessly difficult.

  • iglou@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Or just plainly and simply drop all those big chocolate brands. There is so many better, smaller chocolate brands in literally every european country.

    • skepller@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Plain false.

      Besides Lindt, which is publicly traded and has a minor share of American investors, almost all the other brands are family owned, which is rare in the modern food industry (Kinder, Nutella, Ritter, Knoppers, Toffifee and Haribo). Tony’s is backed by the Belgian investment group Verlinvest.

  • flamingleg@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    the Ferrero brand make nutella and kinder bars, and they also financially support the zionist entity and their ongoing genocide of palestinians. If that’s the kind of thing you’d rather not support i’d suggest avoiding ferrero (and nestle)

    • Chais@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Plus they use a ton of palm tree oil, so there’s the environmental impact in top of that.