• Tuukka R@piefed.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    This agreement has been coördinated with USA and i therefore not merely a suggestion by one side of the war.

    There are many parts on it that are known to make it impossible for the Russia to accept the agreement, and there are points that the Russia will abuse if it ever signs this agreement.
    Things that tell that the Russia is not expected to accept this:

    • 7] Ukraine would get a definite date of EU accession – apparently regardless of whether it fulfills the criteria or not
    • 13] The Russia would never agree to implement educational programmes in schools and across society as a whole that promote understanding and tolerance of different cultures. Especially eliminating racism is diametrically opposed to the base values the Russian government has been emphasizing in the school curriculum. If that was done, people in the Russia would notice what lies they had been fed until the yesr of signing the agreement and would be sure to revolt.
    • 17.2] Returning all detained children would be a tough thing to do because the “new parents” were promised by the Kremlin liars that they’d have the children forever. As their own. (As their own slaves…)

    (Furthermore, a Finnish translation talked about both sides ensuring their armies will filly respect the gemeva conventions. This would mean completely retraining all of the Russia’s military, also making it clear to them that what they had previously been explicitly trained consists mostly of war crimes. How.would that show in their support to Kremlin? Heh. But, I cannot see that part anywhere in other sources, and the Finnish article said their text had been translated by an “AI” (and then “proof-read by a reporter” meaning that maybe this part was just hallucinated by the bot.))