• acockworkorange@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      The thin spindly ones? I’m from south of the equator, we don’t have a huge variety of pines here. Never seen anything like that.

      • the_artic_one@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        Here’s a chart from the Pacific Northwest. Only the top left quarter are actual pine cones but if you asked someone here what a “regular pinecone” is, they’d probably pick the Douglas fir cone (though TBF, “what kind of tree is a Douglas fir?” mystified science for decades).

        Source

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Oh that’s cool! The Poderosa pine is the only one I recognize, and I think that’s because of a misguided attempt at “reforestation” that used this non native plant. The Araucária is the only native pine-like I know, but I don’t know whether you’d call its massive dry fruit¹ a pinecone. Tasty seeds, though.

          ¹: The pine

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          Being from Texas, all of these look strange to me. If you ask us what a “regular pine cone” is, people would definitely point to a loblolly pine: