• acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    The thin spindly ones? I’m from south of the equator, we don’t have a huge variety of pines here. Never seen anything like that.

    • the_artic_one@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      Here’s a chart from the Pacific Northwest. Only the top left quarter are actual pine cones but if you asked someone here what a “regular pinecone” is, they’d probably pick the Douglas fir cone (though TBF, “what kind of tree is a Douglas fir?” mystified science for decades).

      Source

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Oh that’s cool! The Poderosa pine is the only one I recognize, and I think that’s because of a misguided attempt at “reforestation” that used this non native plant. The Araucária is the only native pine-like I know, but I don’t know whether you’d call its massive dry fruit¹ a pinecone. Tasty seeds, though.

        ¹: The pine

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        Being from Texas, all of these look strange to me. If you ask us what a “regular pine cone” is, people would definitely point to a loblolly pine: