• Omega@discuss.online
      71·
      11 days ago

      apparently:

      1. Loss of Protected Status:

        • Civilian transport loses its legal protection if used for military purposes (e.g., transporting weapons or combatants).
        • Once identified as a military objective, it becomes a lawful target for attack, endangering civilians nearby.

      2. Perfidy (Treachery):

        • Prohibited under Article 37 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions.
        • Using civilian symbols (e.g., Red Cross/Red Crescent emblems, UN markings) to disguise military operations constitutes perfidy.
        • Example: Hiding missiles in an ambulance marked with a red cross to deceive the enemy.

      3. War Crimes under the Rome Statute:

        • Intentionally using protected civilian objects to shield military operations qualifies as a war crime (Article 8(2)(b)(xxiii)).
      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.socialEnglish
        9·
        11 days ago

        To me that says no.

        There was no civilian aid symbology as far as we know, no UN, etc. Russia probably wouldn’t allow them in anyway.

      • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        8·
        11 days ago

        So TL;DR, no, this is legitimate deception, as long as it’s not coming from anything that pretends to be humanitarian aid or other protected status

        The only potentially war-crime part is making Russian civilians unwitting accomplices and potential targets.

        • adr1an@programming.dev
          1·
          10 days ago

          The only potentially war-crime part is making Russian civilians unwitting accomplices and potential targets.

          That’s no war-crime. That is Kremlin against their own people (murder is not war crime…)

          • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            1·
            10 days ago

            I am not a lawyer, and doubly so when it comes to international law. But what Ukraine was doing in these operations might, might constitute a war crime, since this is transporting materiel and launching an attack from trucks that are driven by enemy civilians. That’s pretty close to a human shield. I am not sure if trickery, as opposed to coercion, makes a difference when it comes to these things, and also, for them to be human shields someone has to figure out there’s a target there in the first place.

            When Russia is, y’know, just straight up using human shields: https://lieber.westpoint.edu/weaponizing-civilians-human-shields-ukraine/

            I’m not saying this to demean the operation, it was brilliant. But international law is complicated, so I’m sure there’s some war crimes to be found when you dig deep enough.

            Слава Україні!