Around Germany and Greece there were other countries. They went by names like frugal four and PIIGS. They forced “austerity” and stricter working hours onto indebted countries to save their own banks.

The colours on this map show well that northern “productivity” is not about working hours, but about other topics that did not get addressed. Among these topics are also tax heavens (think the Netherlands) and money laundering (think Austria’s special relationship with Russia).

So it was nothing more than poor political leadership without vision.

  • SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    OP doesn’t seem to understand how these data are compiled.

    In most tourism-related jobs (e.g. restaurants), people don’t count their hours.

    This completely distorts the data for countries like France.

    In Scandinavian countries and Germany, is common for 1 parent to work 50%. They also earn 50% (actually even less). This also distorts the data for these countries.

    Finally, many of these states are about contractual hours. Not actual. If you work overtime, this is not accounted for. If you don’t declare employees, is the same. And if you don’t work, while being at work, i it’s still counted as work.

    Final word about the critics of Spain, Italy, Portugal and Greece. Most of these people criticized the fact that they take long breaks and “waste time” while at work (=do chitchat).

    They usually don’t realize, that while Germans commonly leave work around 5pm, people in other countries stay until 6, 7 or even 8pm.

    For the chitchat part, it’s mainly that they don’t value it.

    Didn’t get too offended by idiots ;-)

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Both this and the OP seem kinda confused, honestly.

      The working hours argument was never an argument in the first place, at least at the level of government policy. This chart was used to dispell some myths among the population, but it wasn’t particularly new information for anybody making policy even at the time.

      If anything, a frequent clarification in the impacted countries was that this shows a productivity issue in some of the Southern countries, where more hours and less output is an issue. And yes, the weight of retail and service industry jobs has an impact on that. Also, to my knowledge, this IS about actual worked hours, not contracted hours. These numbers don’t match contracted hours per country, and were bandied about to explain why excess overtime damages productivity, not the other way around.

      None of this had much to do with austerity, beyond promoting or dispelling some stereotypes. Austerity was about investment and public spending and was demonstrably, patently some bullshit. Dogmatic German-style (and Dutch and British, don’t think I’ve forgotten) anti-spending policy proved itself counterproductive, useless and imprevious to facts, as the US kept cranking up investment, particularly under Democratic administrations, and outpacing European growth.

      Which is not to say that Southern economies didn’t need reforms for productivity and increasing employment. But those reforms weren’t about cutting spending or public investment, beyond plugging the hole the housing and investment crisis left behind.

      • maptoOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Thanks for putting the effort to detailing this.

    • maptoOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      So working 50% distorts the data by reporting 50% of the hours?

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s opposed to when one party stays at home full time to take care of the children, it’s not counted, and doesn’t detract from average work hours of the people that have work.

        It’s probably similar in other countries, but here (Denmark) the norm is that women work full time just as much as men, and this has been the case for decades. Also our unemployment rate has for years hovered around the theoretical minimum.
        The retirement age has been increased, and is now about 70 years, and for younger generations it is set at 74!! IMO that’s too high, and I don’t believe the argument that it is necessary. But that’s what our government has done.
        So as a population I’m pretty sure we probably have reasonably high average rate of work hours per capita.

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m confused by your statements, but am looking at moving to Germany. Do you mean if my wife works full-time and I work full-time we’d end up being paid 50% each?

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        No but part time jobs are paid less, so if you work full time and get €2000,- and then switch to half time you will typically get less than €1000,-.