- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
Who’s stopping you? I pointed out the irony in Europeans, who constructed and benefit from the most brutal imperialist system in human history, presenting themselves as underdogs when threatened by other empires, all of which were targets of that imperialism.
That would itself be enough to make fun of current events. But no, I was referring to the excessive wealth and material security members of the EU enjoy as a result of their ongoing colonialism. The EU was founded to safeguard the capitalistic interests of its wealthiest members and it operates in the best interest of those members. Corporations protected by its legal and economic framework continue the extractive capitalism Europeans have been engaging in for half a millennium. They overfish off the coasts of poorer – almost always formerly occupied – states, enforce mining and other resource extraction policies with the intent to push the environmental impact of their system onto the indigenous peoples in those nations, use their international legal system to pressure uncooperative global-south states into compliance, create refugee crises then commit genocide against refugees. Sometimes they even explicitly and overtly join in on US military occupation of these states in their countless military cooperation policies or straight up just committing their soldiers directly to invasion such as in Iraq and Afghanistan. I mean, you can’t act like you don’t know about how the EU has propped up the genocidal Israeli regime in Palestine after over two years of massive public demonstrations in the EU to challenge their state compliance.
Don’t even try to play stupid about whether this is the case, because I know for sure that you know about the Danish overseas territory primarily populated by the Inuit: Greenland.
You sitting here – in the wealth generated by all of this – and acting like youre a victim for something some vague, living ancestor did is itself a means to enact this colonialism. If the EU is in danger, good. It has to end like every empire does.
Your state will turn its violence inward before it prioritizes you over the colonialism.
You’re goddamn right I have a bad attitude about colonialism.
orioler25@lemmy.worldto
AssholeDesign@lemmy.world•They "cannot guarantee" the product description of the 1.3k dollar laptop theyre selling is accurate because they used chatgpt to write itEnglish
3·12 days agoYes, these are all good examples of how these imperatives manifest in law and why they are so unsustainable. Capitalism is not capable of long-term planning because of this, it depends on an immaterial world to exist and therefore does not consider the reality of the world it exists in.
When they say it can do jobs, they aren’t actually claiming that it can, what they’re saying is that they can argue that it can, and that creates its own value. They’ve fired and rehired people, done layoffs, cut wages, cut salary and contract benefits; all of this makes labour cheaper, which validates that value and raises the speculative value.
orioler25@lemmy.worldto
AssholeDesign@lemmy.world•They "cannot guarantee" the product description of the 1.3k dollar laptop theyre selling is accurate because they used chatgpt to write itEnglish
3·12 days agoSkippin a few steps there. Very Gowron strat.
orioler25@lemmy.worldto
AssholeDesign@lemmy.world•They "cannot guarantee" the product description of the 1.3k dollar laptop theyre selling is accurate because they used chatgpt to write itEnglish
3·12 days agoI’m afraid the EU is also a capitalist system my guy. Consumer protections are nice, but have not prevented the issues I described above.
orioler25@lemmy.worldto
AssholeDesign@lemmy.world•They "cannot guarantee" the product description of the 1.3k dollar laptop theyre selling is accurate because they used chatgpt to write itEnglish
13·12 days agoI mean, this kind of missing why AI is so favoured by capitalists despite its obvious unsustainability. AI is already extremely overvaluated for a number of reasons, but its speculative ability to expand corporate ownership of consumer computing while eliminating/devaluing human labour created a potentially infinite vector of growth in a stagnating industry. Because all of these companies invested so heavily into this, largely in a scramble over intellectual property, they were able to realize numbers for this speculative value. Since immaterial financialization is the only kind of growth in a system that is so imcompatible with material reality, these companies have no other option but to adopt the technology, as to deny it would mean that they are not following a profitable vector of growth.
It’s a very perfect situation to demonstrate exactly why capitalism is an unsustainable system. Infinite growth and profit imperatives literally makes it impossible to make effective decisions.
“Held accountable” doesn’t mean anything wuthin this system, as the legal framework is designed to the interests of capital. They will not choose to stop because neoliberal politics and economic have constructed the state as a viable vector of revenue and risk absorption should any of these gambles fail (especially after the '08 recession).


Removed by mod