leoj

working as intended, they killed the invaders!

Watch “Ozark” if you have access to netflix or can yo-ho-ho it, its an excellent FICTIONAL series that provides a lot of NON-FICTION information about money laundering.

I disagree with your entire premise that raids have anything to do with demand on an addictive product.

See all illegal substances, and their demand across the board - so much demand that people risk fines and imprisonment to deliver these items.

I honestly don’t understand how you can purport to know the cost-benefit ratio of police salaries, nicotine vape sales, and the tax revenue they generate; it seems like you’re talking out of your hind quarters.

tax money is important, would be the priority they saw here.

I don’t see anything that indicates danger according to the american cancer society, according to them it is entirely cost benefit although they do admit it has not been thoroughly studied in populations 45+.

Having multiple sex partners, or recently divorced is an indication for getting it though - so if you’re a big 'ol slut (<3) you should consider it at any age, if you can get it paid for.

Hopefully not me, I follow medical science, although obviously herd wide health practices will suffer which may result in higher mortality for everyone, even those who follow medical science.

yikes, dude is gonna be draining the four humors.

I’m only half of the decision tree, but I really appreciate your kind words of encouragement :) we’re trying, but cautiously.

yeah definitely a meeting point of factors.

also this is global, so I thought there was a strong correlation between agrarian societies, having low or depressed wages, and having lots of kids to help with the farm labor, or because there isn’t much else to do for fun.

This could be a regressive imperialist view, idk, but its what I was always told about the correlation between wages and children, especially on a global scale - would be interested to see this same chart for singular countries, the USA for example.

Other commenter pointed out that typically higher incomes generally come with rights for child bearers… So that also could have something to do with it too.

Anecdotal, but partner and I have put off having children multiple times due to affordability, IE who can take that much time off work and still pay food/rent costs?