minus-squarekitnaht@lemmy.worldtoTechTakes@awful.systems•Whoops! Google's reached a new level of JAQing off and decided to answer the questions instead of just leading to themlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-230 days agoProblem it wasn’t a hallucination - it was referencing a paper that has been debunked. These aren’t made up numbers, they’re VERY specific numbers that come from a VERY specific paper. This one: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289610000450 – If I’m not mistaken. Created by a Nazi Sympathizer Richard Lynn and the Pioneer Fund The problem is that this also managed to get cited more than 22,000x creating a feedback effect that reinforced the AI’s learning. linkfedilink
Problem it wasn’t a hallucination - it was referencing a paper that has been debunked. These aren’t made up numbers, they’re VERY specific numbers that come from a VERY specific paper.
This one: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289610000450 – If I’m not mistaken. Created by a Nazi Sympathizer Richard Lynn and the Pioneer Fund
The problem is that this also managed to get cited more than 22,000x creating a feedback effect that reinforced the AI’s learning.