Yeah, the more data you have around the database the better, but that’s always been the issue with data governance - you need to stay on top of that or things start to degrade quickly.

When the governance is good, the LLM may be able to keep up, but will you know when things start to slip?

I’ve done some work on natural language to SQL, both with older (like Bert) and current LLMs. It can do alright if there is a good schema and reasonable column names, but otherwise it can break down pretty quickly.

Thats before you get into the fact that SQL dialects are a really big issue for LLMs to begin with. They all looks so similar I’ve found it common for them to switch between them without warning.

If you install windows it can, but natively it can’t as those games don’t support Linux. However, you loose a lot of the value of the steamdeck (SteamOS) by installing windows.

Also windows sucks on a handheld. I dual booted for a while, but it’s just not really worth it.

If you liked BOTW, it’s basically that plus a little extra. If you were a little done with BOTW by the end, then it’s a bit of a slog.

Personally, the build ability makes most of the puzzles too repetitive. Additionally it feels like most of the game is collecting resources so you can then do fun things (I was even using duplication cheats and it felt like a chore).

I thought Arms was a blast! Like Mario kart or super smash I did a good job of walking the “competitive, but fun” line.

Otherwise I agree, only Splatoon2 was really unique to the switch. Everything else was released on the WiiU.

This is such a mess. Not only are they chargin more than anyone expected, but the upgrades have different tiers.

Can’t wait to see how tariffs impact this too.

I was actually looking at a chart earlier today, and it’s crazy. They had declining sales going from NES->SNES->N64->GameCube.

The first time a home console beat the sales of the NES was the Wii, when they stopped chasing performance of the systems.

Not the same chart, but to provide proof - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_game_consoles

Yeah, everyone giving it kudos doesn’t realize its actually even more restrictive than the previous setup.

Before you could:

• Have two consoles playing the same game (as long as both had wifi access).
• Have two consoles share a library when not in physical proximity.
• No time limit on sharing.

Admittedly you could only share games one way with that, so it really only worked for two people. So families with more than two switched are about the only ones this would benefit (maybe a group of friends in close proximity).

Yeah kinda feels like that guy may have failed history class. Nothing like rolling over for the aggressor.

Have you used the switch eshop? It takes seconds for some things to load on that.

Is that for all operations or literally just to run the paid services? Cause if that includes the free services, marketing, R&D then they have a lot of options to cut costs.

Given what AWS/etc. charge for their LLMs/APIs it feels like the entire industry is subsidizing LLM compute to stay competitive. But I could be wrong there.

This is something I’ve been speculating for a while. The cost of running these complex systems (as OpenAI models aren’t just LLMs) is subsidized so heavily that we don’t really know the cost of running these things.

This is a huge risk to any business, as the price for these services has to go up significantly in the long term.