hendrik

Thanks for the community recommendations!

You’re probably right. I don’t spend a lot of time on Mastodon. I likely missed drama and defederation. Other than the occasional shitstorms. But I think that’s just “a thing” on microblogging platforms. And the German privacy nerds I follow on Mastodon do way less of it anyway.

And regarding language… That seems to be a factor as well. The German speaking community here on Lemmy established a different atmosphere. From my perspective, there’s way less yelling at each other amongst the Germans than in the broad English speaking Threadiverse. There’s trolls and a lot of memelords, but seems to me some people still remember the “Netiquette”. And those ideology- or identity wars aren’t as loud. I heard from other people, it’s similar (also a noticeably different atmosphere) in the French speaking corner.

Reads a bit like the description of the average nerd? We’re nearly all into Star Trek (to some level), write way too long and measured paragraphs. A good chunk isn’t really into politics, instead they’ll spend their time reading blog posts on how this place is designed… The Threadiverse has in fact stopped growing (by user count)…

I’d say we better stop all the witch hunts. We already have plenty drama here, every other week. Leave them be and focus on something constructive. For example using all the activity tools and statistics to filter out all the slop bots 😅

Thanks for explaining. I’d agree with the reasoning. And it’s a mix of several factors, I think. Basically our history. We grew and that means you can get away with more (bad) things in a large group of people than in a smaller, more tightly coupled group. We attracted a wider audience, so now it’s not just a few privacy nerds, Linux users and a buch of tankies coexisting, but all ideological factions of society. We also got a few Reddit refugees who got banned over there for good reasons.

But in my opinion it’s an entire thing: The political landscape got way more extremist in recent years in general. And we do lots of talking about politics here. So with being a link aggregator and sharing news articles we get all the polarizing stuff and due to psychology, people share negative news articles because that gets you riled up and want to talk. Or fight. We also copied some social media design elements which reinforce some specific kinds of negative behaviour. Subscribing to groups does compartmentalization. And the entire philosophy of the Fediverse adds yet another layer of compartmentalization, which doesn’t always work in our favor. I think it also awakens some tribal instincts in some people. Which might not even be bad(?) unless they start to disunite and fight each other. Which some do. I don’t think that’s an issue on Reddit for example, because that’s just one central place, plus they keep a tighter leash on their mods. And Mastodon would be yet different because you can’t split up into groups/communities, there’s just people to be followed and global hashtags. And once there’s any level of normalization of drama and negativity, the internet will add more on top 😅

I wonder how many people realize the importance of independent platforms. Especially with what’s going on in politics, big tech, shaping discourse in a top-down way… All not really healthy for society. And we got an uptake in surveillance, manufactured truths, all the age-verification already cost us some internet forums in the UK… I think the Fediverse is more important than ever.

Did we grow, though? You say it like it’s accepted truth. But every time I have a look at the numbers (for example on Fediverse Observer), it seems to me like we’re doing the opposite. We peaked 3 years ago and we’ve been shrinking since. It’s even worse for platforms like Mastodon. Seems they’ve lost several hundreds of thousands of users. I’d say we here on Lemmy/PieFed/MBin kinda stabilized(?). I also think there’s been a slight uptake in content and discussion. Feels to me we’ve become more active over the years. But judging by the numbers, I’d say it’s because we lost the new users and lurkers. And these days our average userbase shifted to people who (on average) post more. But we didn’t grow as in: there’s more people around than it used to be.

What do you mean by “I don’t see it anywhere else where I’ve been.”? The Lemmyverse in contrast to other Fediverse platforms? Or the Fediverse versus other social platforms? Commercial (with algorithms) or free? I mean I sometimes see some destructive tendencies on Mastodon as well. And there’s a lot of shenanigans going on in YouTube comments, on Reddit or underneath half the newspaper articles. But I’d also say a lot of platforms come with a unique atmosphere. Either due to the userbase or because of how they’re set up and what kind of behaviour gets reinforced due to platform design.

Yeah, we kinda all still share this space… So I get to put up with things. But I’d agree, there’s lots of positive stuff here. It just needs a good dose of subscribing and unsubscribing from other stuff. And I sometimes wish we had more of the good stuff. Like we definitely got conversation going about mainstream stuff (and politics). I mentioned Linux as well and there’s about enough people here to talk about that, get someone’s questions answered and computer fixed… But with my more niche hobbies, there’s like 3 other people who are into that. So I regularly struggle to get a conversation going. I think we need more of that. On Reddit or Discord, there’s a lot going on, even for the most absurd hobby or interest, people post their original content… And I think we still need way more of that.

Hehe. I think we inherited a lot of that from social media. I always like to believe we could be an old-school Linux forum, or one of the places where we discussed hobbies like bicycles, knitting… whatever. For some reason, those used to be way more constructive and positive. And while we had drama, it used to be way more toned down. I don’t really know why it’s sometimes different here. We have elements of that. But maybe we lack a clear goal? Other than negative goals and growth or non-growth? Maybe it’s in part the userbase. The platform layout, psychology… Or we’re just doing way too much politics and memes here. Back in ye “good old days”(?) politics used to contained in specific corners. And since social media that’s 80% of what everything is about…

But it kinda all depends on what people expect the network to be like.

Well, the software is written and the network is ran by the people who use it. So we’d be age-verifying and spywaring ourselves!?

They’re coming for us.

That doesn’t work anymore. Modern disinformation campaigns include things like dozens of different articles or posts in many different locations. And we have strategies like flood the zone. You’ll end up cross-referencing. You’ll find 10 different resources or you’ve heard it 200 times already. And at some point you start believin’… It’s impossibly hard. At least from the perspective of an office chair and by using internet information.
I think most I can do is judge by who started it. And who keeps bombing kindergartens and apartment buildings. I’d say that’s probably the evil ones. And those happen to be the same ones who reportedly do all the coordinated misinformation.

Hmmh. It’s likely a “the only winning move is not to play their game” situation. Upside of institutions like the BBC is: in theory they should be doing fact checking, pay experts to look at it and see if it’s plausible, try to find the sources… Try to show both sides of a coin. Doesn’t always happen in practice… But if your alternative is to re-post stuff from social media or random internet sites… Well… you’re exactly in propaganda territory. That’s unfiltered where all the evil people post their fakes. Have bot armies to push narratives. Make it seem like roles are reversed… And you’re bound to lose. It’s a proper paid full time job to push propaganda online (and offline). And those people are experts and they’re resourceful (and have resources, i.e. money and access to stuff). They’ll likely outsmart you, beat you with all the manpower they have at hand, and you’re just a pawn.

And to not only write negative stuff: I somewhat trust the OSINT guys. Dunno if that’s what you’re looking for. They do a lot of quantifying stuff. And some more. Less so opinion pieces or news articles.

Maybe also add a flair which news is fabricated and what actually happened… A lot of “information” put on the internet isn’t “POV” but propaganda.

It’s a very involved discussion to be had. There’s the difference between what should be, and the reality of what people do. And I’ve been trying to convince people for decades now. And it’s hard to impossible across the board. I’ve seen how we slowly moved from blogs, Linux forums, more open messengers to WhatsApp, asking Linux questions on Reddit and just not writing genuine personal blog articles any more. I think it’s been a constant decline for like 15(?) years now? And that’s across generations. Even the boomers enjoy WhatsApp for example. It’s hard for me even to convince anyone to move to Signal, which isn’t that different from user perspective. They’re already all comfy within a silo. Yeah, and now -for some reason- the youngest people don’t even own a laptop anymore. They kinda need the apps. And they’ve been taught to be at the receiving end of consumerism.

Also kinda hard to find allies to start some kind of revolution. I like how PieFed for example expands on the concept we have here. MBin as well. But mainstream opinion here is something alike a Reddit clone. The majority of the audience wants(?), needs(?) that.

And I feel “for free” regularly isn’t a good point to lead with. From the average person’s perspective this isn’t about cost, they’re not even aware internet platforms cost money. As Google, Meta or X or the Chinese don’t take money from the average user either. Nevertheless, they provide them with all kinds of features. So in my opinion we need to advertise with other distinguishing features and sort out cost some time later.

I’m not sure if that’s how internet platforms work as of today. It’d be a nice idea, for sure. And I think we have some all-in-one platforms. Or at least platforms who aspire to do a lot of different things. But other than that, I think it’s kinda the same situation in the commercial internet. X does shorter public messages, Reddit does threaded discussions. YouTube does longer videos. Instagram does enless scrolling through short clips and images… And group chat rooms will be on Discord or WhatsApp. Classified ads and garage sales will be yet another platform… There’s some blurry lines, for example YouTube can do image stories. But it’s designed in a weird way and not really mainstream. They do short clips but you kinda switch modes when doing that and all younger people rarher stay on Instagram and TikTok anyway. People announce their events on Instagram all the time but it doesn’t specifically help with the use-case. One thing they all have in common is some vaguely similar commenting system. It’s social media after all. But I think they all focus on a specific subset of things. I know Elon Musk has some dream of providing an everything-app. But he can’t do it either.

I wonder what average people even like. I kinda liked the early idea behind social media platforms like Facebook. You could send memes there, talk to friends or strangers, sell old stuff, talk about your pets in some group. or whatever. Maybe there’s some space for one of our platforms which isn’t occupied by a lot of competing platforms…

Ridiculous. We need to develop one [new] universal standard.

Lots if nice users posting original content.

Sure. But usually you’d encode some known concepts into latent space so you can see what my Linux-yness is. Or how my vector aligns with whatever leftists write?! What use do the numbers have unless you do something with them? Other than write them down into a database?

I doubt it. For example you both just decided to write normal language.

If ChatGPT wrote it, it’d be: [Affirmation], it is not AI who invented it, but humans have been using it all the time before AI, blablabla, em-dash, blablabla. It is not a reliable signal em-dash it is a common rhetorical pattern, blablabla.

I think though it is used by humans, it’s not really used the same way. And not in every goddamn post 😅 And then both of you used contractions, you were both able to make a concise point in one paragraph… All things cheap AI doesn’t do.