

Lol. I think FIFA demand a pile of money from people integrating the live streams into their platforms. We should start the fundraiser soon.
And I think I’m going to boycott the world cup 2026, so make this the women’s world cup in 2027.
A software developer and Linux nerd, living in Germany. I’m usually a chill dude but my online persona doesn’t always reflect my true personality. Take what I say with a grain of salt, I usually try to be nice and give good advice, though.
I’m into Free Software, selfhosting, microcontrollers and electronics, freedom, privacy and the usual stuff. And a few select other random things as well.


Lol. I think FIFA demand a pile of money from people integrating the live streams into their platforms. We should start the fundraiser soon.
And I think I’m going to boycott the world cup 2026, so make this the women’s world cup in 2027.


Yes. And I’ve seen people do really weird (and worse) stuff, like re-post questions. And if you’re unaware of that, you’re bound to take 10mins out of your day to answer the product or Linux or life question and later find out you were ripped off. At least that’s how it feels to me if people fabricate that kind of activity. And it kills the mood to write comments for a while.


Alright. And for your information, the Peertube function is a bit broken. I think the Peertube developers did their best. But Youtube has a lot of datacenter IP address ranges blocked. And they do rate-limiting and force people to sign in after downloading a few videos. Plus yt-dlp (which it relies upon) and Youtube are playing this cat and mouse game… So it’s disabled on most instances because it doesn’t really work. I was able to make it work on my instance, but I had to jump through several hoops. Configure a SOCKS proxy and tunnel it over my home, residential internet connection. And I think I transferred my login cookies because some videos would be age restricted.


PeerTube has that built in. You can set up a channel and have it import or mirror a Youtube channel. For Lemmy there’s several bots and scripts. As other people said that’s what lemmit.online is about.
Be a bit careful when rolling this out. Several people don’t like it. They’ve left Reddit for a reason and this is drowning them in bot activity. And usually these posts are low engagement, Reddit users can’t see the comments, so you’re not getting a lot of answers. I think it’s good practice how we here have separated that to dedicated instances, so users can just have genuine conversations everywhere else.
Always a breeze once I go to a music festival or bigger event and there’s all the diversity with the German language. I think there are many places like that. And even in the larger metropolitan areas you can tell the difference between Cologne, Düsseldorf and the Ruhrgebiet and the people slightly to the east or north of it. At least where they grew up because all of it mixes in the cities and people will also commute 1h to work. So I think it happens in villages, cities and everywhere. It’s not entirely the same, though. Seems to be more nuance here than proper dialect, but people from 3 cities away will occasionally tell me on how my grammar has some funny peculiarities.


What’s the encryption and signing on a hardware level for? I mean dependent on what’s that good for and who controls it, it’s trusted computing, or treacherous computing as Stallman calls it…
(I mean it’s not working out great for GrapheneOS either. Back in the day I had a phone I owned, with privacy features added and alternative background services so I had a pretty much Google-free experience. These days it’s all locked down, I hand out my private metadata to Google, can barely ride a train without, or get a discount in the supermarket. I can’t do backups and I’m f***ed if I want to cross a border to a more restrictive country because these guys are in on it as well. They’re probably going to use it to limit what I can install. And more and more manufacturers lock down bootloaders etc and I thought we were past this. Graphene itself advised me to switch to proprietary code in the name of security and they’ll have a look at the code later, once Google eventually releases it. All of this is due to (or related to) these security measures working way too well and that’s also why they’re being used. I wish my phone didn’t have a TPM but a simple disk encryption like LUKS on Linux instead. And I don’t see many reasons why we should copy these very bad dynamics.)
I think the overall idea is nice, though. We had these project ideas to just plug in a box and be self sufficient in the self-hosting community since the SheevaPlug. Or the FreedomBox. There are some hardware projects as well like the Home Assistant Green or back in 2019 they tried to sell a Pioneer-FreedomBox. None of those match exactly with your proposal, but I think they’re pretty close. Maybe get in touch with them and see if you can participate in a new iteration, or read about their past experience with the proposed target audience. Especially FreedomBox seems like a good fit to me. They’re not very loud, but afaik still around. And they’re Free Software nerds, which seems to align with your idea, minus the locking it down and transferring control to other parties via the TPM.


Thanks. Bizarre conversation. But from all sides really, also wild to just claim they don’t know what a zero day is and that’s just made up. I think it’s super unhealthy no one looks at the actual code and what they’re doing but it’s completely hypothetical and about what people say, not do. Like what code quality they actually have. That’d be a good indicator for their users to judge. And also to judge how clever these people are. But seems that’s exempt from the discussion. Idk. Thanks for pointing me at this, I wasn’t aware. I’ll scroll through it some more.
And I’d really like to know what those developers see in AI that I don’t see and why they use it in the first place. From what I can tell by scrolling through their PRs, Copilot hasn’t been of much help to them. And there’s a reason why other people use or avoid it. I still think it’s not as bad as portrayed. The review process will deal with AI slop the same way it does with malicious PRs from the NSA or Russian hackers… It needs to handle all of it 100% so slop doesn’t really stand out here. But it’s really weird to do experiments in a password manager and not some side-project.
Edit: And now that I see that, I kinda hate how mobs show up in their Github repo to spam them. I don’t think this is the solution either.


debate the merits of slop code in a password manager elsewhere
I’m just commenting, I didn’t make the post?! I mean I like 80% of what they say. I think it’s great to have transparency and a review process in my password manager… Just not AI…


Isn’t “to double down” a blackjack reference? I mean sure, they’re upholding their position here. And it might be debatable whether that’s a risky game. Just saying they didn’t change anything with this statement.


Lol. How is that doubling down? That’s what we concluded two days ago in the discussion over at !fuck_ai@lemmy.world from what they did in the previous months. And now they confirm it is in fact like that… And… I mean it’s not a secret. They’re actually pretty transparent with it and the statement matches almost exactly what they’ve been writing in their Github repo for some time now. I mean we might not like what they do. But I really don’t see how they double down on anything here.


Thanks, that sounds reasonable. Especially the focus/attention.
Maybe it’s the same as with other games or computer games… Some people also really get something out of fantasy achievements and when they win and feel like the main character… in a weird way…


Interesting. Why would more manipulative people and ones with more focus on self-interest use AI more than other people? Because they’re more likely to take shortcuts while doing stuff? Or is there any other direct benefit for them?


Is this just your personal opinion? Or did any expert have a look at it and analyze the video? Surely there must be some third-party fact-check out there?! I mean not that TRT is a trustworthy news outlet to begin with. But it’d be nice to cite some source, not just do wild speculation.


Ahem, what next-generation LLMs? The ones they keep promising and fail to deliver? Seems we’re at gradual improvement these days. ChatGPT 5 isn’t sentient or AGI like they claimed it would be but merely marginally better than version 4. I have no doubt it’s gonna be the same with version 6 and 7 in the next years. And it’s far from being able to program computer code at the level I do?! We’d need some insane scientific breakthrough. Other than that I think it’s going to replace callcenter workers, designers and artists, cashiers… And I suppose robotics is looking promising. Maybe restocking the shelves can be done by robots in the future. We already have a lot of automation in logistics.


Nice. Though a bit of context would be helpful. What is a z-score? Where is this from, and where can I read more?
Well, diversity is the central idea behind the entire Fediverse… We get many different perspectives on the same content. That includes many individual instances and individual software. The opposite of that would be no diversity. One platform and one software, like Reddit or Facebook or most big commercial services. And we have projects in between, both federated and non-federated, even crypto-based, which combine many aspects into one platform.
I don’t see how that post would be a good example to advocate for the approach. It has 23 comments, quite average compared to other posts. So it’d still end up with a similar ranking…


Oh, hey! I suppose technically you’re on MBin? But yeah, now that I’m aware… I regularly see kbin.earth pop up somewhere.


Btw, this is a very old article. PieFed is lightyears ahead from where it was one and a half years ago. KBin ceased to exist. (Edit: And is continued with MBin now.) And I didn’t follow Lemmy’s development so I can make any statement there.
I’m not sure if this translates to the content creators. There’s many of them whom I really like to watch who do (or did) Youtube as a business model. Tom Scott being one example or Derek Muller (Veritasium). I’m subscribed to many more. Simplicissimus and their yet better second channel (in German). We wouldn’t have those without monetization. The platform of course went shit over time. Fortunately my Ad blocker still works and thanks to Sponsorblock my experience is fairly alright… But personally - I’m split on this question. We had quite the amount of entertainment before monetization but I think a large amount of quality content also arrived after that, and because of it. Those people would be working some office job today if it wasn’t to Youtube. And I (and the world) would miss out… On the other hand we got MrBeast, a lot of fake cooking videos…