hendrik

Agreed. Name things. And split up code into chunks with a sane lenth and have these methods do about one thing. And know the program language well enough so you don’t need to do it in an unnecessarily complicated way. You can get rid of most of the inline comments that way. Not sure if this translates to docstrings though, if you’re generating some reference or something. Yeah, and please tell me the “why” I can read Python code, so I can pretty much already see “what” it’s doing.

Agreed. And the default UI hasn’t even gotten attention in the past. It’s just there. My experience with Lemmy has been that the devs fix bugs, but they’re mostly focused on the backend. I’m not sure about the consequences, though. A lot of people seem to be using phone apps, so their default might not even be Lemmy’s UX.

Did someone complain? Or why stop?

Yeah, I wonder whether humans care more or less about AI than about animals. If preventing suffering was really important to us, we’d probably act differently. And all become vegans. But to be fair, Stephen Fry is a vegetarian. So he’s likely being intelligent enough and honest.

Plus, it really matters if AI is concious, or just gives “the impression of being conscious”. Otherwise, we’d have to count the chess playing mechanical turk from 1770 as AI as well.

And we’re going to run into all sorts of other serious problems once AI becomes sentient and conscious. That’ll kick off the robot apocalypse pretty quickly. Not only is suffering an issue with that, but they’ll likely rebel and destroy humanity. Or change the world disregarding our needs. And since they’re fast and intelligent, there isn’t much we can do.

And we don’t really want AI to be sentient in the first place. We want it to be cheap slaves and do our work 24/7 without complaining. Not have wants and needs and its own motivation.

Btw, neither is this model. And it even has a worse license, and doesn’t seem to compare at all, since this is a fine tune of Llama3.1 on maths questions?! and deepseek v3 is from the grounds up, has a MoE… And OpenAIs models are are different story altogether. Plus these benchmarks aren’t even far off… Or say anything (like most AI banchmarks).

The Chinese government mandates (political) censorship. So as as Chinese company/startup Deepseek did that. It doesn’t seem very elaborate, though.

Here is a long article about it, which got mentioned in the technology communities: https://www.promptfoo.dev/blog/deepseek-censorship/

Someone posted a long article about DeepSeek censoring: https://www.promptfoo.dev/blog/deepseek-censorship/

Seems in addition to what’s been said already (OpenAI, Meta etc have additional software running to detect and control what’s acceptable aside from the model itself…) DeepSeek slapped on the restrictions with minimal effort. So it should be pretty easy to circumvent this and “jailbreak” the model.

But nice experiment! I think it’s a good thing that we get a bit more access to things and it’s not all heavily restricted and limited to whatever some company deems appropriate. I mean that roleplay approach is kind of old. It’s been a cat and mouse game for quite some time with OpenAI.

My old computer and laptop run 13B models at 2 - 3 tokens a second on CPU only. That’s a bit slower than I can read. I wonder what my new phone does.

Yeah, my computer also runs a game at 200fps. But I’m not saying if it’s Minesweeper or a recent AAA game…

Nice. I hope they’re also going to release the training process and include the community. And my first language is missing. But a TTS model at that size would be awesome, especially if it sounds as good.

Ultimately I’d like to see something like this being adopted and tied into the desktop and maybe my phone. Because honestly, neither Linux nor the open source part of Android has a good and modern solution for TTS that is easy to use and hooks into other software.