i am more than willing to engage on any positive claim you want to make (i probably agree with a lot of them). what i’m not willing to do is tolerate personal attacks and dogpiling.

fields used to grow grass could be used either for other (human-edible) crops

some. I doubt that’s true for most grasslands.

from the abstract

We then analysed the potential of replacing food-competing feedstuff—here cereals, whole fish, vegetable oils and pulses that account for 15% of total feed use—with food system by-products and residues.

a distinct minority of animal feed competes with human food

and the feed grown “for animals” is largely a byproduct of plants grown for people. it’s incredibly dishonest.

this is (at least partially) based on poore-nemecek. it’s bad science gaining entrenchment.

source