• 5 Posts
  • 94 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 22nd, 2024

help-circle











  • It’s propaganda, period.

    Every top news post in .world is some tabloid outlet, reposting another source, and mods do nothing about it.


    Normally, I’m fine with that “old internet” feel of craziness flying around everywhere, but mimicking Reddit’s structure so closely makes things feel less diverse/discoverable, and more like echo chambers blotting out the sun… which is exactly how previous Reddit alternatives died.




  • brucethemoose@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldwe need more users
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    A lot of communities have rules that posts need to be titled the same as the source article, which, while it prevents editorializing, it also brings all those ragebait headlines here. Plus I’d like to see Lemmy users’ opinions moreso than an article I could just read myself.

    If half our content is just reposted mainstream media, why would one expect our comment sections to look any different than the comment sections of those mainstream sites?

    I agree with the sentiment but disagree with the prognosis.

    In my experience, the ragebait articles around here are largely from the same sites. Rawstory, mediaite, dailybeast, some of The Guardian’s more indulgent pieces. I won’t presume to know why the posters post them, but they’re ragebait to start.

    I don’t even see “Big Media” like Reuters or local news or whatever get upvoted much. And as longs as the news sections aren’t mixed up with the opinion ones, IMO they’re more professional.

    The accurate title rule is great as long as posters pick more journalistic articles instead of opinion pieces or reposts. And if they don’t there’s no fixing that anyway.

    I’d probably prefer more of the political post to be thoughts/feelings and then discussion is backed up by decent articles

    And I straight up I disagree with this.

    There are tons of talking heads with opinions. But journalism rooted in sourcing is much harder. That should come first, or at least come with an opinion in the OP, and then the discussion can be built around facts.



  • I like Lemmy as a “zoo”

    I like seeing nuts and weirdos and niches and stuff when I scroll by. It feels like the old internet. And I also find that lemmy.ml has good discussions outside tankie politics, so I don’t want to block that out.

    Problem with the main political subs is that they’re so big they flood post sorted by Active, Rising, or New Comments. Their tabloid garbage crowds everything else out.


  • brucethemoose@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldwe need more users
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s addictive. It’s not like I haven’t steeped in it either.

    This is what I keep hammering; people can’t help themselves, especially under stress. Perverse engagement incentives need to be fixed structurally to give us a fighting chance, otherwise Lemmy/Piefed will end up like Voat and all the other Reddit clones.


  • brucethemoose@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldwe need more users
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    On the contrary, I’ve made a few (not a ton) of what I thought were interesting news posts, but they don’t seem to gain traction.

    I think the deeper issue is ragebait works, very well. The community seems to be content with that, and Lemmy/Piefed devs aren’t structuring the site the counter it.