• 13 Posts
  • 102 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 5th, 2023

help-circle




  • It’s a joke playing on the common thing boomers (in North America) say “You’ll see how you’ll start voting for less taxes when you get older and you’re gonna stop being a bleeding heart librl when you get to live in the real world!” The people saying this displaying the right wing psychopathic tendencies. In the research adolescents are displaying uncooperative egoist tendencies which then change towards more cooperation as they grow further. That’s the opposite of the boomer talk, and it can be mapped to getting more lefty over time on the political spectrum.



  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOPtoYUROP@feddit.orgFirst or last, never in-between
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    We researched publicly listed companies for each country in Europe, then used DNS lookups to identify the mail exchange records for each company’s domain. This let us determine what company they use as their email service or email security service providers. And as email is the foundation of most business tech suites, we expect most companies that use US-based email providers also use other their services, like cloud storage, for example.

    Src








  • I don’t mind it too much. If the community itself can deal with ir by voting on the posts, it’s a more democratic solution and it has a built-in consensus. Mods killing it makes life easier but it produces more quesrions among the community abt whether that was the best course of action. Kinda like how some people feel about being censored on .ml, no offence. Isn’t that a dialectical relarionship of sorts, the effects of more vs less moderation?

    I guess it depends on the people’s culture. If they come from a lib background, less moderation is more productive. If they’re used to authority taking care of things instead of them having to do the work, then more moderation is better suited or else people would complain mods aren’t doing their job.

    And speaking of moderation. OP got banned. 😄



  • What I’ve noticed:

    • The posts themselves follow almost identical structure. Large quotes with poster emphasis.
    • The posting topics is almost identical.
    • The reliability of sources is hit-or-miss on all posts. Some are from legit sources, some are from really questionable ones. The questionable ones are common between accounts.
    • The communities where they’re all active are the same. Lately there’s a bit more separation where some accounts frequent some communities more than others. E.g. some time ago we used to get Hotznplotzn, randomname and Scotty in !Canada. Now we mostly get Scotty.
    • When you engage in conversation the lang expression, attitude and arguments are identical. This when I really noticed the pattern.
    • I’ve had multiple accounts from this set group up/down vote their/mine comments, deep into a discussion that didn’t attract other up/down votes.
    • I’ve had a discussion that reached a dead end with one account, only for another to show up and restart it from a different angle attempting to reach a different conclusion. E.g. first discuss an economic side of some China-related issue, reach a dead end, restart with human rights abuses side on the same topic. That’s while having the group up/down voting action going on.
    • Two of the accounts were created on the same date, on two different instances, a few minutes away from each other. This was the smoking gun for me that this is the same person.

    Some of these aren’t damning on their own, but put altogether make me believe it’s one person. Also they never deny that when pressed. The conversation just stops and they disappear for a day or two until the next post.

    a disgruntled Hong Kong exile with too much time on their hands

    Quite possibly. I think they may live in Germany or be German because I’ve seen some activity in German. Who knows. I doubt they’re a paid actor because there’s enough money in the official media machine pushing this line so I think you’re right. Someone who really hates China/CCP/CPC, perhaps for a good reason of their own, with a lot of free time. It really sucks because there are really interesting discussions that can be had on any of these topics. There’s another guy around here whose family emigrated from China because they weren’t having a great time with the 1-child policy among other things. He’s in the US and can have rational and interesting discussion about this stuff without bursting in flames.

    E: Here’s a recent unhinged discussion with Scotty.





  • There’a a global positive shift in opinion on China that’s happened over the first year of Trump. The trend was already there in the “Global South” but it’s now happening everywhere. This shift is driven by real economic and geopolitical pressures. E.g. US tariffs and military threats, Chinese investment and cheap EVs, etc. Add to that there are more people on Lemmy from non-NA/EU countries than on US-centric platforms like Reddit and this shift becomes even more apparent here. In Western countries the positive opinion on China is less one of an ally and more of a necessary partner. In Canada, the opposition to trade with China shifted from 80% in 2020 to 32% at the end of 2025.

    If you’re primed to not see anything positive about China, then even positive views around partnership could appear as pro-China propaganda. Also people in the Global South are much more aware of US and European atrocities so when you present China’s atrocities as a counter to people’s positive opinions, it looks unserious and hypocritical to them. If you see their hypocrisy callout as a propaganda method and you call it out as such, you lose all good faith credibility with them.

    Pics:

    From

    PS: Along with this shift, comes the realization among some that a lot of what they thought about China came from corporate US interest via US-owned media that pushes a line useful for that interest. This has happened to me and multiple RL friends and family in Canada. The conversations on the last thanksgiving table have changed a lot since 2024. At present we’re in the necessary partner camp.


  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOPtoYUROP@feddit.orgSomeone take her vodka away
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think they know this. They’ve supported his policies so far. I’m pretty sure they’re salivating at the money they’ll make from Greenland’s natural resources. They don’t give a shit about the collateral pain for the average American, let along European. If they did, they wouldn’t have supported Trump’s tariffs for example. Republican reps can stop Trump at any time if they wanted to.