Wigners_friend

So they found something LLMs can actually do, and predictably it’s incredibly evil.

Lol, indeed.

Edit: Thanks, I unsubbed this feed. Scientific illiterates masturbating over how “objective” their data is.

Not understanding stuff, maybe there’s a term for that.

So it’s a global trend based on non-global data carefully selected to leave out anything that doesn’t agree?

I can only laugh at this. “Most important countries”, yes no pattern.

Are you concerned that nothing in your reply addresses whether the countries were chosen to support a trend?

If you leave out data that bucks a trend you like, then you are being selective.

A reasonable point, but extremely difficult to square with the claim made by the OP. Also, the rest of Africa exists.

Presenting data is an argument. Because you decide what data to present and how. If you leave out data that doesn’t support a statement you made based on data you present, then there is an issue.

Right, but microscopic European populations are still included because they support the thesis.

There is one African country and nothing from the middle east.

Sure, but only a single African country and none from the middle east.

Quite a selective sample for such a big claim