So they found non-existing references in 0.1% of 2.5 million papers examined, and only 0.01% contained more than 2 fake references. Their method also appears to have had a false positive rate for fake references of 7/10.

While the problem is concerning, and growing (fuck AI), 99.9% of papers are ok. We have always known we have to read every paper critically, now there is just an extra thing to look critically at.

In my experience, a way bigger issue is references that don’t actually contain or proof the information for which they are referenced.

The booking page on small hotel websites so often just refers back to their bookings.com page.

Duolingo is american. They also showed pro-israel ads.

Tldr. Children are taller mostly because they are also wider, which is a bad thing.

Sure, when you make decisions for yourself. Not when you are advising others or giving your truth as the full truth.

The title is very misleading. This study is saying that it does not matter if you do a low-carb or low-fat diet, it matters what the quality of the food is. Basically eat more plant-based high-quality food and less refined carbohydrates and animal fat. So go ahead and sprinkle olive oil on everything if it makes you happy.

Are you seriously saying you know better than the scientist who did extensive research based on your anecdotal evidence with n=2?

High-quality plant-based foods.

Sorry to disappoint, but it is stated the effects of hypoxia persists for up to a month. So you would just slowly get back to normal state.

Although calories in, calories out is valid, people are not robots. Much of diet science is not on how many calories we should consume (we have that pretty much figured out), but on how we make sure we do it in a way that leaves us satiated and sane. So just commenting on any study about diets with “cico is all that counts” is ignoring a lot of nuance. What is interesting is to learn whether this method of achieving negative cico works for more or less people than other methods.

Also based in the french alps and I put it in the pocket of my skipants. I’ve been using this combo for three years now and it has not failed me. Multiple layers also means adaptability for warmer weather instead of being stuck with a thick skicoat.

A cheap option is using a warm jacket covered with a raincoat. Those are not specific to skiing so you can use them the rest of the year too.

Thanks! A quick look through the list was so helpful to make sure I am doing things right. I’m really surprised by Le Petit Marseillais and will not buy again. And so many snacks! I believe following the non-american diet might make me healthier as well.

Yes, humans cannot eat grass (for example), but grass is also not a byproduct. And fields used to grow grass could be used either for other (human-edible) crops, habitation or for wildlife restoration.

It probably depends on the source, but here (france) you can ask your butcher for byproducts to feed to your cats/dogs and they give it for free.

That is incorrect. Around 40% of fields are used to grow food for livestock, as well as a quarter of fish caught being fed to animals. I found this article saying we could slightly increase byproduct use for feed, but they are minor improvements. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-022-00589-6