Do they also have explosives to put on the drones? Drones alone won’t help. And no, “the news” hasn’t convinced me of anything, my brain did. If most people don’t have guns, there isn’t any need for more guns. Amazing how that works, right? This concept works perfectly in most of the world. So disarming is the only logical answer, if everyone is forced to give up their guns (or at least the more dangerous ones, like AR-15s).
Guys, we need to ban AR-15s. Guys, ignore the fiber optic drones for less than a thousand bucks. Guys, we really need to get this AR thing done and dusted.
What else is this comment supposed to imply? Waving the gun at the drone and kindly asking it to turn around?
Because they could just shoot people instead of using drones? Drones are used in Ukraine because they provide a good overview of the front lines, are able to also defeat tanks, among other things, and can attack targets inside enemy territory from a distance. Of course I have no idea what a civil war in the US would actually look like, but MAGA is not fighting for territory (or not yet, I guess), let alone with tanks and in trenches.
Good luck shooting down a small and relatively fast moving object 50 m in the air with an AR-15. And why would MAGA need drones to kill people in their own country?
How did you even make this about some completely unrelated stupid US-American shit under a video about Ukraine?
Because people can (and should) sign the initiative even if the threshold for their country has already been reached.